We performed a comparison between Microsoft Dynamics AX and Microsoft Dynamics GP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Almost all of the features that we use are efficient. Live master planning successfully handles all of our company's requirements."
"One of the valuable features of the solution is how easy it is to use."
"The product's most valuable features are its day-to-day operations, Power BI-driven workspaces, and homepage."
"Dynamics AX provides a lot of functionality."
"According to user feedback, the product's most valuable features are modern web-based accessibility and user-friendly interface."
"The tool's most valuable feature is reporting."
"All its features are valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the workflow of the modules."
"The stability was reliable."
"I haven't used it a lot, but the best thing is that the processes are very detailed."
"The system is easy to customize and has user-friendly access. "
"It's enhanced by a subscription billing add-on, to efficiently automate billing and invoicing, particularly due to our substantial customer database."
"We have gained the capability to control and address various issues within the financial module effectively."
"The fixed assets, payroll, the data module, and user-friendliness are most valuable."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The solution offers integrations with other software as well. We have integration with Microsoft Office where we can do Word and Excel, etc."
"From a consultant's point of view, I recommend an enhancement in terms of detailed documentation for the products on the website."
"There should be the capability for users to enhance the application by using a low-code or no-code product from the Microsoft family."
"We do not have access to daily projections."
"At times there are issues related to reporting, sometimes with the integration between two or three modules, and sometimes to the logic itself."
"This solution could be improved with more expert resources and an easier implementation process."
"It is being decommissioned."
"The product takes some training to get up to speed on all functionality and modules in Microsoft Dynamics AX 2012 ERP system."
"There is room for improvement in the licensing model and associated costs of this solution."
"It still can be improved in web-based and build reporting. "
"This is now a legacy product, so they're phasing it out over time."
"The issue we're encountering is that it's primarily designed for independent installations and not initially structured as a cloud-based solution, which has led to challenges with connectivity."
"What could be improved is the functionality of Dynamics GP because it requires a lot of development by the programmers and the company in order to integrate into a solution."
"The purchase order and processing aspects of the solution should be improved."
"There should also be extra redundancy when posting to modules. We use different sets of books such as CashBook and CheckBooks therefore if I select the wrong one the solution allows the transaction to just pass without warning."
"As for room for improvement, they have different modules, project and analytical accounting, but it will be good to have that kind of part in the standard package. To have that additional reporting functionality where you can add an attribute or something, which you can report again. So you can analyze the cost by not just natural accounts but also by a project, without having to go through another module edit on top and then the other module edit on top. The more modules you add, sometimes it doesn't work that well. Additionally, it would be easier to have the solution on the cloud. That's our consideration. We are trying to move all our systems to the cloud, and GP is one of them that we are going to move in the next couple of years. I would rate the solution seven or seven point five out of ten."
"Many of our customers are migrating to the cloud rather than staying on-premises."
Microsoft Dynamics AX is ranked 6th in ERP with 52 reviews while Microsoft Dynamics GP is ranked 13th in ERP with 22 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics AX is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Dynamics GP is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics AX writes "A stable product that offers excellent ROI and reliable technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics GP writes "A user-friendly solution for accounting and sales purchase model with all options in one frame". Microsoft Dynamics AX is most compared with SAP ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite and NetSuite ERP, whereas Microsoft Dynamics GP is most compared with Oracle E-Business Suite, Epicor ERP, SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA and Odoo. See our Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.