We compared Microsoft Dynamics CRM and Oracle Fusion Service across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: Microsoft Dynamics CRM is considered robust and reliable. Users praised its ability to measure and track sales and seamless integration with Microsoft Office 365 and Azure. Oracle Fusion Service is known for its ability to seamlessly integrate solutions like the Cisco PBX system. It is also recognized for its stability and scalability.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Dynamics CRM requires improvement in terms of mobile experience, interface design, and performance. Oracle Fusion Service customers suggest enhancing the account creation process and improving integration with older platforms. They also want more customization options.
Service and Support: Reviews of Microsoft support were mixed, with some users expressing frustration at long response times and challenges contacting the support team. Customers have praised the customer service for Oracle Fusion Service, which includes a dedicated service manager and easy access to specialists.
Ease of Deployment: Some Microsoft Dynamics users found the setup uncomplicated, while others struggled with it. Setting up Oracle Fusion Service is complicated and requires expertise.
Pricing: The cost of Microsoft Dynamics depends on factors like licenses and customization. While Dynamics is generally considered expensive, some users find the pricing fair or slightly cheaper compared to competitors. Customers say Fusion Service is expensive.
ROI: Microsoft Dynamics CRM provides a significant ROI due to its upgraded features and integrations. Oracle cultivates strong relationships with customers, leading to a favorable return on investment.
Comparison Results: Users like Microsoft Dynamics CRM for its native integration with popular Microsoft products, but some users have said that setting up Microsoft Dynamics can be complex and time-consuming. Others have suggested lowering the price and improving the interface. Oracle Fusion Service is praised for its seamless integration, stability, scalability, and reliable technical assistance. However, some users had trouble creating new accounts, and many found the solution expensive.
"The product is user-friendly."
"The Outlook calendar has been very helpful for us."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics CRM is its performance."
"I like the fact that I can keep track of everything I do in relation to my own job."
"One of the most useful features is we can configure Microsoft Dynamics CRM in the way that we need. This is configurable."
"Microsoft Dynamics CRM has good integration with the Microsoft Stack of solutions. However, the Salesforce ecosystem is stronger."
"The way it effectively works with the array of other Microsoft tools, such as Azure, is valuable. It works very well with the use of data linking and things like that. Overall, it is a great overall tool to have an effective understanding of the transactional background of each of our customers."
"The most valuable feature in Microsoft Dynamics CRM is funneling."
"It has provided a faster turnaround time. We were able to automate a number of transactional tasks and return that extra time to taking care of customers."
"Stable and scalable with good technical support."
"Everything is managed by Oracle, so they have security in place."
"Oracle's strength lies in swiftly building and deploying enterprise applications globally."
"Previously, my clients used a smaller ERP system, not a major one. However, they have now transitioned to Oracle, which provides them with a more extensive range of options. Unlike before, it's now an integrated system that covers various aspects, including finance, supply chain management, and other functionalities."
"Oracle Service Cloud could improve the integration for older platforms."
"Oracle offers a wide range of applications, each capable of delivering significant value to our business."
"The solution changes the way clients work to make it easier and faster."
"This CRM system needs to be more configurable. Its performance still needs improvement, because its screens hang while querying data. It's also not highly scalable, so scalability also needs improvement."
"Better integration would be an improvement."
"The UI could definitely be improved."
"Microsoft Dynamics CRM can improve by adding more artificial intelligence. Additionally, they should add more modules, such as account-based management, that are available on other platforms such as salesforce.com."
"Microsoft Dynamics CRM could improve by being more user-friendly and having a better design. I have used Service Desk and it is not user-friendly but this solution is worse. The graphical interface is not intuitive, you need someone to guide you or you will have difficulties navigating around to find the file you need. The data we are normally dealing with is boring enough and the interface could be more attractive and more exciting. The tabs and arrangement could be done better to be more user-friendly. Microsoft Excel, PowerPoint, and Word are fine and Microsoft should extend their user-friendliness and intuitiveness to Microsoft Dynamics."
"It would be better if it were more secure."
"It could be less complicated for smaller organizations."
"The approvals component of Dynamics is complex. It isn't very easy to generate approvals between different departments."
"One suggestion I have is to shorten the IT team's response time. When we submit an ASR or similar request, it takes a while to receive a response, and this can be seen as a drawback."
"The user experience has to be much better."
"The dependency on the dollar makes these products more costly during disruptions in currency parity, especially in countries like Pakistan."
"Oracle counts users for licensing purposes, regardless of their roles or usage patterns. This process could be better."
"Oracle Fusion Service needs to improve its documentation part because we do not have proper documentation."
"The product must provide modules for operations management."
"The product's initial setup phase was very difficult."
"The vendor must provide a user-friendly mobile application."
Microsoft Dynamics CRM is ranked 2nd in CRM with 68 reviews while Oracle Fusion Service is ranked 8th in CRM with 30 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics CRM is rated 7.8, while Oracle Fusion Service is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics CRM writes "Intuitive APIs, customizable design, but dashboards could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Fusion Service writes "A reasonably stable and scalable tool to manage human resources, payroll, and expenses of a business". Microsoft Dynamics CRM is most compared with Salesforce Sales Cloud, SAP CRM, ServiceNow, Siebel CRM and monday.com, whereas Oracle Fusion Service is most compared with QuickBase, Siebel CRM, Oracle CX Sales, Salesforce Sales Cloud and Sales Creatio. See our Microsoft Dynamics CRM vs. Oracle Fusion Service report.
See our list of best CRM vendors, best CRM Customer Engagement Centers vendors, and best Marketing Management vendors.
We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.