We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and NGINX Plus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Pre-programmed functions for .NET Framework are widely available."
"The solution's technical support is very good...The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The tool offers a lot of support, and there is a lot of knowledge material available, along with a lot of community groups."
"The .NET Framework is a very good framework. It does what I need it to do."
"The technology is very scalable and accessible to use."
"When it comes to the user interface, the context is better than other tools because it is easier to use."
"The most valuable feature is the financial accounting."
"Microsoft Platform is the only viable solution when I wish to do something that is not supposed to be cross-platform."
"I think installation only took a couple of minutes — no more than 10 minutes."
"The most valuable features are the gateway and the ability to publish to sites."
"-"
"Using NGINX Plus for web traffic distribution is fantastic. It offers performance similar to physical load balancers but with added flexibility."
"Nginx is simple to configure, very stable in a highly utilized environment and very modular, allowing DevOps to create it's own modules for interactive use with Nginx."
"The robust software architecture allows for it to be scalable and very stable."
"With NGINX, I appreciate its ability to route traffic geographically."
"The product is resilient."
"Needs stronger security with respect to cloud issues."
".NET Is still heavy or dependant on other Microsoft libraries and frameworks."
"Better integration with other tools to make the operation faster would be an improvement."
"I would like to see a better response time from the technical support."
"Microsoft could improve .NET Framework by providing more resources to help users understand the solution."
"They could enhance support for Python within Visual Studio, as integrating Microsoft products with other frameworks can present a steep learning curve."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The .NET open source community could be larger."
"They should do in the open source version of what they did to Advanced HTTP, TCP, and UDP load balancing."
"The scalability could be improved."
"The solution's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"The KPI should be more focused on load balancing and the latency in application calling from the end system."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The solution needs to be easier to setup and deploy."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."
"The scaling should be built into the software rather than configured from an outside source."
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while NGINX Plus is ranked 2nd in Application Infrastructure with 28 reviews. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while NGINX Plus is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NGINX Plus writes "Quick installation and very easy to manage while doing orchestration or automation". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server and Oracle SOA Suite, whereas NGINX Plus is most compared with IIS, HAProxy, Kemp LoadMaster and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). See our Microsoft .NET Framework vs. NGINX Plus report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
