We performed a comparison between Nutanix Unified Storage and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the easy interface."
"The solution is stable and extremely easy to calibrate."
"Currently, the most valuable aspect of our Nutanix implementation is its file storage functionality."
"Nutanix Objects is reliable."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward. With a few clicks, you can stand up your storage. It reduces the overall life cycle of deployment within the ecosystem."
"We can utilize mixed storage block-sized objects and combine various databases within a unified interface."
"Nutanix Volumes is a perfectly stable product."
"The most valuable features are the interface and support."
"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."
"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The tool is very user-friendly."
"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."
"Improving quota policies would be advantageous, particularly by offering the option to implement blocking instead of just issuing warnings."
"The graphical user interfaces could benefit from more attention to detail."
"With all of the Nutanix equipment, the licensing is expensive. We operate in the enterprise space, but we're a midsized company. At times, the price tag is a little bit shocking for a company with only 35 employees."
"We have issues with software updates occasionally."
"The only thing I would say is missing for us it is FTP protocol compatibility."
"Managing other storage infrastructure on Nutanix Files Storage is an area for improvement. In particular, I want to add other forms of storage from different vendors not currently in Nutanix Files Storage, to the file server, for better management."
"The solution should increase its storage capabilities."
"The interface could be improved."
"The scalability could improve."
"The scalability could be improved."
"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."
"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."
"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."
"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."
"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."
Nutanix Unified Storage is ranked 6th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 39 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 8th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Nutanix Unified Storage is rated 9.0, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Nutanix Unified Storage writes "Provides good performance, longer uptime, and an easy way to manage our data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Nutanix Unified Storage is most compared with Dell PowerScale (Isilon), Red Hat Ceph Storage, MinIO, Dell ECS and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), whereas Wasabi is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Google Cloud Storage, Amazon S3 and Oracle Database Backup Service. See our Nutanix Unified Storage vs. Wasabi report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
