We performed a comparison between Okta Workforce Identity and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can automate the process of adding users to Okta if they are activated in Active Directory, or if they are added to the database of applications or Active Directory in the last couple of days."
"The solution can scale very well."
"I am able to authenticate my users on cloud and SaaS applications such as Workday through Okta workflows."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature in Okta Workforce Identity is the single sign-on, universal directory, and lifecycle management."
"The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are MFA, and SSO, which have high security."
"Its simplicity and its integration with various vendor-agnostic platforms are the most valuable features."
"Enabled MFA to access federated applications as well as increased user satisfaction through improved provisioning times and more reliable processes."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The solution is simple to use."
"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."
"They also have single sign-on (SSO). When we bought Okta Workforce Identity a year and a half ago, I was also looking at SSO, but not much documentation was available for SSO. The documentation for SSO should be a little more robust for somebody who is implementing it for the first time."
"UD attribute mapping, Okta group rules, and dynamic usage could use improvement. It also needs more in-depth functionality and features to integrate with RADIUS solutions."
"We've not had any problems with Okta."
"The training is too costly."
"On the admin side, we can create our own passwords instead of generating one, which is usually difficult to explain to a user."
"I would appreciate it if Okta Workforce Identity becomes more user-friendly. Its API technology is complicated. Certain applications may pose challenges in terms of integration, especially when they require IDP technologies that aren't easily codable. While I can't provide specific examples, some applications may not integrate with Okta Workforce Identity."
"In some setup cases, there are issues with attributes not going in properly."
"Its pricing needs improvement."
"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."
"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."
"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."
Earn 20 points
Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 3rd in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 59 reviews while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is ranked 21st in Single Sign-On (SSO). Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.4, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access writes "Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well". Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt and Auth0, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Auth0. See our Okta Workforce Identity vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.