We performed a comparison between Okta Workforce Identity and Tools4ever HelloID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup of Okta Workforce Identity is straightforward. I was able to get an environment ready within half a day."
"The most valuable features depend on a customer's needs. Our customers generally find multi-factor authentication very useful."
"We can automate the process of adding users to Okta if they are activated in Active Directory, or if they are added to the database of applications or Active Directory in the last couple of days."
"The solution so far has been very stable."
"The tool helps improve our security and productivity."
"It's easy to use and straightforward."
"I find the provisioning features and the integration with other applications useful."
"First of all, the solution is very simple."
"Now we can easily control who has access to which client or client application."
"The Single Sign-On capabilities are endless and we haven't found a single app so far that couldn't be set up for SSO."
"The most valuable feature is the option to use SSO from different sources such as Microsoft AD, ADFS, Azure AD, SAML, form-based, etc."
"You don't need to be a specialist in Identity and Access Management solutions to understand the software and configure it."
"Okta doesn't have a partial push. It pushes down the full profile schema for lifecycle management or provisioning."
"They should focus on improving them to provide top-notch team access management while still offering those typical features."
"We have experienced some challenges in integrating this solution with Scope and Cognito."
"The solution lacks an on-premises deployment model so it can't offer a hybrid solution. It would be ideal if clients had options that weren't just cloud-based."
"The product does not offer enough integration capabilities."
"The solution’s policies are difficult to understand due to the policy methods. They use authentication. The solution’s workflow is also difficult and not very active. They need to have proper documentation on it. In the next release, I would like to see the workflows being more digestible."
"It only facilitates provisioning and not de-provisioning."
"It can have more API integrations."
"When something needs to be changed with the sign-on policies, we have to apply this manually to every client environment that we have."
"Integration with other Tools4ever applications such as SSRPM and IAM would be nice."
"Sometimes it generates a username that is not unique, but at the time of this writing, it is not possible to generate a new one that is unique."
"I would like to have the built-in provisioning module improved."
Earn 20 points
Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 2nd in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) with 59 reviews while Tools4ever HelloID is ranked 27th in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS). Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.4, while Tools4ever HelloID is rated 9.8. The top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tools4ever HelloID writes "A flexible solution for application management, and facilitated centralization of our IAM". Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt and Auth0, whereas Tools4ever HelloID is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Microsoft Entra External ID and Imprivata OneSign. See our Okta Workforce Identity vs. Tools4ever HelloID report.
See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors and best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.