We performed a comparison between OpenText Documentum and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We like Documentum for its capacity and reliability."
"The most valuable feature is the management."
"It is a very secure system. It is reliable, and that is one of the reasons people manage their content within Documentum. It gives them the confidence that the content is accessible to the right people and not to the wrong people."
"We primarily use it for storing documents. We host a variety of documents in OpenText Documentum. This includes raw files, analyzed files, and documents in multiple formats."
"It has reduced the amount of paper documents; reducing time and errors in the process."
"OpenText Documentum has improved availability and performance in our organization."
"It is quite good."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the security, storage, and document search capability."
"The most valuable feature of SharePoint is its ease of use."
"Information is much more readily available."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is file sharing or information sharing."
"This solution has helped us with the categorization, organization, management, discovery, and delivery of program and project related information."
"It facilitates collaboration and the ability to create custom workflows."
"No code and low code, scalable, and stable collaboration platform. Straightforward to set up. Its support system is good and offers fast issue resolution."
"The initial setup is easy."
"It is well supported by Microsoft."
"OpenText Documentum has a lot of scope for improvement in terms of adding some AI integrations."
"It should provide more tools to help clients upgrade solutions based on Webtop."
"The biggest issue for us is the price of the product."
"OpenText Documentum's user interface could be improved a little bit."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"The main issue is the software's performance when storing around 10 million or more documents. It becomes slow and needs improvement. Perhaps it's a cloud-related issue, but it needs to be addressed. It could be due to our S3 bucket or something else. Nevertheless, this is a significant challenge we're facing."
"The vertical application could be improved."
"OpenText Documentum needs to improve its support."
"The initial setup was very complex."
"We would like more security features, like automating."
"Flexibility and extensibility, above everything, could be improved."
"It should have more user-friendly customization, as it still requires developers to get engaged and build sites."
"Using SharePoint is difficult."
"Integration needs to be more straightforward, particularly with Azure. SharePoint also needs a more comprehensive introductory course for users."
"I would like it to be more compliant with global regulations. There are certain features which could be included that currently are not there, such as compliance and record management capabilities."
"SharePoint’s scalability could be improved."
OpenText Documentum is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 150 reviews. OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase, Alfresco and OpenText Content Manager, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, WordPress and IBM FileNet. See our OpenText Documentum vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
