We performed a comparison between Opinnate and Tufin Orchestration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewall Security Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Version upgrades can be done quickly."
"The platform is easy to deploy and maintain."
"Tufin is the only multi-vendor firewall tool that is available, and it helps to bring everything together and report on what all of the rules are."
"My team uses it heavily to audit the changes made by junior engineers, going back and figuring out what they messed up, and correcting their mistakes. We generate reports for customer compliance and audits, as well as for regulatory audits."
"Visibility is its largest and most valuable feature. You can see everything or all the devices on the network for each customer. It provides you a larger view of what might be wrong with the network and how you can improve it with firewall rules, etc. If you are talking about secure change, being able to automate the entire change process is pretty much the winner for us. It is going to really reduce the time that it takes for us to do changes, and we can just go out and get more customers."
"We use it to clean up our firewall policies, which gives us better security policy and less junk on the firewalls."
"You can easily scale the solution if you need to."
"It is extremely scalable. It really addresses the scale of a company's firewall footprint."
"Tufin is our audit trail for all changes. We have to be PCI compliant, and it's the tool we go to for enforcing PCI on the network side."
"The most valuable feature is the compliance check and the recommendations that it makes."
"The product's web page view is very basic. They could add new features to it."
"PDF format is not available for Alert Composer."
"The two main negative points with Tufin Orca are the absence of full support and that accommodation of files and tools is not provided in a good way."
"My worry with Tufin is that it cannot connect to Fortinet, which is what I want to do."
"A big improvement would be on the USP policy. If we could use Palo Alto to take those zone names and auto import them into the policy, then just do the policy based on the zone names instead of having to put in every single subnet."
"This solution increases the time it takes to make changes."
"I would really like to see a new UI for SecureChange. SecureTrack 2.0 has quite an improvement in the UI and it flows more smoothly. The current SecureTrack and SecureChange are a little blocky, and sometimes loading a tab or a page is required to refresh information. Whereas in SecureTrack 2.0, they're starting to improve on that."
"Their pricing can be better. It is not very transparent."
"I would like to see the setup of the Unified Security Policy simplified."
"I would like the ability to export information in other formats including PDF, HTML, or Excel."
Opinnate is ranked 12th in Firewall Security Management with 2 reviews while Tufin Orchestration Suite is ranked 2nd in Firewall Security Management with 180 reviews. Opinnate is rated 10.0, while Tufin Orchestration Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Opinnate writes "Good support, nice interface, and simple to upgrade". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin Orchestration Suite writes "A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments". Opinnate is most compared with , whereas Tufin Orchestration Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Skybox Security Suite, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Illumio. See our Opinnate vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
