We performed a comparison between Oracle CRM and SugarCRM Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two CRM solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The reporting features are valuable."
"Everything related to insights and dashboards is valuable. It is great for tracking all the effort and generating reports."
"CRM's performance is good, we've never faced any issues with it."
"It's very easy to find any customer-related data."
"It has a wide variety of use cases."
"It is very simple."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle CRM is the organization it provides."
"For the most part, the solution is straightforward."
"The most valuable features of the SugarCRM platform include its flexibility in customizing fields, layouts, and dashboards."
"It works well with Jira. You can customize it to fit your needs."
"The most valuable feature is relation capability, which allows us to relay customers with invoice orders."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is its low cost."
"The most valuable features of Sugar Enterprise are the exports of graphics, statuses, complaints, and tasks."
"The product is not intuitive."
"I think Oracle CRM could improve its user interface and user experience to make it more engaging. Currently, it has a more traditional enterprise look, but I believe it could benefit from more catchy and engaging colours and designs to better engage with users and stakeholders. While the capabilities might be there, the interface may not be very inviting for first-time users."
"The user interface and performance could be better."
"Their support could be faster. Like any other solution provider, in some cases, it takes time to get their response, and sometimes, they do not fix the issue in the first round. Therefore, we have to go through another round."
"Customization is an area in the solution that takes too much time. So, it needs to be improved."
"I'd like to see more feature enhancements."
"A specialized team is required for managing Oracle, which is extra overhead for the customer."
"Improvements could be made in automating certain tasks, such as automatically notifying me via email when a customer has signed off on a proposal. Some of these features require payment, but including them in the basic package for smaller companies would be beneficial."
"It lacks customization, and this is the main reason that we are switching to a different solution."
"While it is already user-friendly, a slight enhancement in UI design, especially in terms of color combinations, could make the platform more visually appealing and comfortable to use."
"I would like to see more integration on a mobile platform in the next release."
"In the next release, I would like to see personalization of information about customers or specific businesses or opportunities."
"Sugar Enterprise could improve by removing bugs and glitches. For example, a comment was made but in the comment section, it was never displayed. However, the problems we faced might not be the fault of the solution."
"You cannot include all your entities under one instance at the moment."
Oracle CRM is ranked 7th in CRM with 35 reviews while SugarCRM Platform is ranked 24th in CRM with 11 reviews. Oracle CRM is rated 8.0, while SugarCRM Platform is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Oracle CRM writes "The solution is easy to deploy, scalable, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SugarCRM Platform writes "User-friendly and allows for creating your own modules". Oracle CRM is most compared with Siebel CRM, SAP CRM, Microsoft Dynamics CRM, Amdocs CRM and Salesforce Sales Cloud, whereas SugarCRM Platform is most compared with Salesforce Sales Cloud. See our Oracle CRM vs. SugarCRM Platform report.
See our list of best CRM vendors and best Marketing Automation vendors.
We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.