We performed a comparison between PRTG Network Monitor and Statseeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"Nice product with an easy interface to use and a large variety of sensors."
"The fact that I can use custom MIB files to customize my sensors for the things that are not there as a default is a good feature."
"It is easy when it comes to dependencies of devices, so if your router goes down, the three or four switches behind it will automatically be paused so that you don't get multiple alerts."
"It is easy to use and intuitive, which is really important. It does what it says on the box by giving you a visual of the state of what is going on at any one time."
"PRTG is integrated on Windows."
"The product is easy to use and the web interface is fantastic."
"Technical support has been very helpful so far."
"There was only one feature I liked about PRTG Network Monitor a lot, and that was bandwidth monitoring, though, in the newer versions of the tool, that feature is now a bit lacking. Pricing for PRTG Network Monitor is also not as expensive. It's a good tool, even for beginners."
"The most important for us is how fast this solution is, as well as the granularity that you can get to, such as per-minute statistics."
"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."
"The most valuable features are scalability and reliability."
"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the simplicity of adding new devices into it."
"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."
"It is fairly simple and easy to use as an all-purpose network monitor."
"The monitoring provided by this solution helps us to track down and solve issues."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support could respond a little bit quicker."
"PRTG's application monitoring sensor is not strong."
"Scalability is the only major sticking point for me. There is a recommended number of sensors, which is around 10,000 and we're double that... The only option we have to scale is to buy another core, which would be a separate, stand-alone instance..."
"We run it in a cluster, so we have two that run together. The cluster behind it is sketchy at times."
"Along with more room for automation, more room for advanced configuration can be integrated into the solution."
"The dashboarding definitely needs improvement."
"We need something that is more predictive. We would prefer if it wasn't a solution that was corrective and instead offered predictive insights so that we can handle problems before they even occur."
"They could improve the process of updating the license."
"It would be very nice to have the Cisco ACI option included in the regular license."
"The inclusion of configuration management features and SIP links would improve this solution."
"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."
"If it had more detailed NetFlow information then it would be far better."
"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."
"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."
"I would like to see more comprehensive reporting and alerting."
"I would like to have soft alarming. If an inner-base all of a sudden triggers a threshold, we have to rely on a lot of other tools and then we go into Statseeker to verify it. If Statseeker would confirm it preemptively and trigger it into our network panel, that would be nice."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
PRTG Network Monitor is ranked 5th in Network Monitoring Software with 96 reviews while Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews. PRTG Network Monitor is rated 8.2, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PRTG Network Monitor writes "It's an all-in-one solution, and net flow is included in the licensing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". PRTG Network Monitor is most compared with Zabbix, Centreon, Nagios XI, SolarWinds NPM and ManageEngine OpManager, whereas Statseeker is most compared with Fortinet FortiSIEM. See our PRTG Network Monitor vs. Statseeker report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
