We performed a comparison between Qualitia Automation Studio and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"Selenium HQ's most valuable feature is its online community support, which is comprehensive and easy to access."
"The most valuable features of Selenium HQ are it is open source and has multiple languages and browser support. It's very useful."
"The most valuable features are the ability to test and debug."
"The most valuable feature of Selenium HQ is the ability to configure a lot of automated processes."
"Selenium has helped to complete tests in less time, which would not be possible relying on manual testing only."
"Language support - since it supports Java and other programming languages it is easy to integrate with other systems."
"The initial setup is straightforward. Deployment took about seven months."
"The most valuable aspect of Selenium is that it gives you the flexibility to customize or write your own code, your own features, etc. It's not restricted by licensing."
"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
"There are some tiny issues with SeleniumHQ. For example, with respect to the scraping tests. Sometimes, a website will have some hidden items or blockages that inhibit us from extracting data directly. It would be beneficial if Selenium could extract that information."
"It would be better to have a simplified way to locate and identify web elements."
"It does require a programming skill set. I would like the product not to require a heavy programming skill set and be more user-friendly for someone without a programming background."
"We use X path for our selectors, and sometimes, it is difficult to create locators for elements. It is very time-consuming because they're embedded deeply. A lot of that comes from the way that you architect your page. If devs are putting the IDs on their elements, it is great, and it allows you to get those elements super fast, but that's not necessarily the case. So, Selenium should be able to get your elements a lot quicker. Currently, it is time-consuming to get your selectors, locate your locators, and get to the elements."
"They should add more functionality to the solution."
"One limitation of Selenium is that it is purely focused on web application testing."
"Whenever an object is changed or something is changed in the UI, then we have to refactor the code."
"I would like to see some reporting or test management tools."
Qualitia Automation Studio is ranked 23rd in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 103 reviews. Qualitia Automation Studio is rated 8.0, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Qualitia Automation Studio writes "Good Tool for Non Technical Users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Easy to use with great pricing and lots of documentation". Qualitia Automation Studio is most compared with OpenText UFT One and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and Automation Anywhere (AA).
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.