We performed a comparison between Sauce Labs and SonarQube based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."They offer a large number of devices and browser/operating system combinations for real device tests"
"The Failure Analysis feature is really important for us, one of the most important aspects. What is the root cause? Is it because we have a defect or is it that we have a test case that we need to fix or modify? The Failure Analysis is one of the main functionalities that I am exploring all the time in Sauce Labs... The Failure Analysis helps us to discover which test cases we need to work on."
"Sauce Lab analytics helped us to get detailed knowledge on test cases execution and logs."
"The most valuable feature is cross-browser, cross-OS, cross-mobile device testing."
"Sauce Labs helps us identify the root causes of bugs. The solution offers a lot of flexibility by providing the latest iOS and Android emulator versions, and even the Appium updates when it comes out in the market."
"I have found the live test section with Sauce Labs to be extremely valuable. When you can't quite figure out why a test is failing, you can go to the live test results section within their tool and launch your test (specifying a given OS/browser, or device) manually and step through the test to see the issue more clearly, usually opening up the developer's tool console and watching the network calls and console (within Chrome) to usually find the underlying issue."
"It provides zero maintenance browser instances."
"As stated earlier we use Sauce Labs for a combination of automated testing and manual testing. Therefore the most useful features are the ability to run the functional automated tests via a Sauce Labs tunnels which allows access to applications in our internal network. The second most useful feature is the manual side."
"We can create a Quality Gate in order to fail Jenkins jobs where the code coverage is lower than the set percentage."
"Before you even compile, it can catch known vulnerability issues or patterns."
"It automatically scans for code, detects vulnerabilities, and generates daily reports."
"SonarQube is scalable. My company has 50 users."
"Offers multi-programming language support"
"SonarQube is useful for controlling all of our Azure task tracking and scanning."
"Engineers have also learned from the results and have improved themselves as engineers. This will help them with their careers."
"The most valuable features are the segregation containment and the suspension of product services."
"One of the challenging areas for us is the reporting and the matrix. It should be based on roles, but right now it is only available for the admin role. The admin role can really do a lot of stuff, but our infrastructure team, which holds the admin role, is not ready to hand it over to us on the testing team. If Sauce Labs had permissions associated with roles, where this role could do this activity and that role could do that activity, it would be easier for us."
"We had some specific features that we opened tickets on, although they were not earth-shattering. For example, the way the menus scroll could be improved because it does not have a bar, the way that people are used to, where you can move up and down."
"Integration with Github, as well as several other similar tools, could be improved."
"There have been various times throughout the last month or so where the service has gone down during business hours."
"Sometimes pasting text while using "text object" does not seem to work, and it slows down testing times quite a bit."
"Start execution time as each time a set of tests start, it will launch a new VM so it takes a bit of time."
"The testing process is difficult. I need to prove the complete competency of the tool, and I am finding that challenging."
"Progress towards reducing application testing time can be made."
"You may need to purchase add-ons to get the useability you desire."
"The documentation is not clear and it needs to be updated."
"I would like to see more options for security, beyond the basics like SQL injection."
"This solution finds issues that are similar to what is found by Checkmarx, and it would be nice if the overlap could be eliminated."
"There isn't a very good enterprise report."
"Expression of common vulnerabilities and exposures is not always current."
"We called support and complained but have not received any information as we use the free version. We had to fix it on our own and could not escalate it to the tool's developer."
"The pricing could be reduced a bit. It's a little expensive."
Sauce Labs is ranked 11th in Functional Testing Tools with 113 reviews while SonarQube is ranked 1st in Application Security Tools with 112 reviews. Sauce Labs is rated 8.8, while SonarQube is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Sauce Labs writes "Robust documentation, helpful support representative, good licensing model". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". Sauce Labs is most compared with BrowserStack, Perfecto, LambdaTest, OpenText UFT One and Bitbar, whereas SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx One, SonarCloud, Coverity, Veracode and Snyk.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
