We performed a comparison between SCOM and Statseeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"Being able to make and customize management packs and send out notifications is very valuable."
"It can send messages to our ticketing system."
"We have found the scalability capabilities to be okay."
"It takes a lot of the headache out of managing your data centers and software in other places."
"I like the historical reporting of observer metrics."
"It discovers the components automatically, which is a fantastic thing. The discovery works in an automatic way, and it has a dynamic way of discovering the components, assets, and applications. It doesn't require any manual intervention."
"This solution saves us a lot of work because it reduces the effort that is required in order to start monitoring."
"The stability has been great."
"Grouping, Threshold/alerts, Netflow analyser, Private MIB object support are most valuable as they can provide more visibility into network performance, and for network troubleshooting."
"The most valuable features are scalability and reliability."
"Whether it is a down network switch or a down router, we can get back online faster for the customers."
"This solution helps in terms of troubleshooting, and you can do capacity planning with it."
"We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all."
"The monitoring provided by this solution helps us to track down and solve issues."
"If somebody is complaining about slow networking then this solution allows us to see various ports to find out whether they are being overloaded."
"The most important feature is just the fact that it doesn't aggregate the information up, and I can look at detailed information going back quite a long time."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The console feature is very poor, and it would be very good for us if this were improved."
"The solution’s initial setup is difficult."
"On-prem network monitoring is something that could be improved drastically."
"In a future release, they should add email notification alerts."
"I would like to see better support for monitoring Unix-based systems."
"It would be a much better product if Microsoft provided management packs with the product."
"Application monitoring must be improved."
"Direct integration with third-party tools, like ticketing systems, is lacking but would be beneficial."
"Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support."
"If it had more detailed NetFlow information then it would be far better."
"The inclusion of configuration management features and SIP links would improve this solution."
"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."
"There is a little bit of room to improve in the alerting section to give some more options there. It's all I can think of right now off the top of my head."
"I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API. Then I could produce a dashboard that my C level can understand. This is just so they can go and refresh whenever they want to and see what things look like."
"I'd say the interface could improve a little bit. I find with new users, I tend to have to spend a bit of time walking them through how to use the interface. It could be a little more user friendly."
"I would like to see more comprehensive reporting and alerting."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
SCOM is ranked 10th in Network Monitoring Software with 78 reviews while Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews. SCOM is rated 7.8, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". SCOM is most compared with Dynatrace, Zabbix, Datadog, Nagios XI and AppDynamics, whereas Statseeker is most compared with Fortinet FortiSIEM. See our SCOM vs. Statseeker report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.