We performed a comparison between SCOM and ThousandEyes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"They have great integration with the active directory."
"This solution helps our application teams by allowing them to drill further into issues and perform a root cause analysis."
"The most valuable feature of SCOM is real-time alerts."
"The advantages of SCOM are that it is definitely user friendly and a more appropriate solution for what we need."
"We are able to do problem determination on runaway processes."
"The most valuable feature of SCOM is the capability of using classes within your management pack development."
"The most valuable feature is the extensibility, as there are really no limits as to what you can do with it."
"The most valuable features for us are the monitoring, the health explorer, and the console."
"The company provides excellent service."
"The most valuable feature of ThousandEyes is user-friendliness. It has been essential for us to have a solution that is easy to use."
"The installation process is not hard at all."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution was the ability to see how the connection quality is between the sites and get an alert if it was turning bad."
"The authentication overall - including to the VPN and LAN - is excellent."
"It's fairly easy to set up."
"From our perspective, ThousandEyes stands out as an invaluable tool because of its deep and extensive capabilities."
"ThousandEyes gives companies better visibility."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"SCOM's feature that notifies us when a server is down is not present in recent updates, which has weakened the product."
"Non Windows monitoring is fairly weak. Network device monitoring is not reliable."
"On-prem network monitoring is something that could be improved drastically."
"I would like to better be able to monitor Oracle processes."
"It could use some system enhancements, such as better dashboards."
"Direct integration with third-party tools, like ticketing systems, is lacking but would be beneficial."
"The price could be improved."
"It would be a much better product if Microsoft provided management packs with the product."
"I would like the product to offer more agility."
"It might be practical to extend monitoring capabilities to include network devices"
"There is room for improvement in terms of customization and user-friendliness."
"Presently, it lacks the ability to integrate with other Cisco products."
"Once I fully use the tool 100%, I'm sure I would have something to critique, however, for now, I'm happy with it."
"The guest portal is hard to use."
"It would be nice if the solution covered other areas like server monitoring."
"It's an expensive solution."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
SCOM is ranked 10th in Network Monitoring Software with 78 reviews while ThousandEyes is ranked 12th in Network Monitoring Software with 11 reviews. SCOM is rated 7.8, while ThousandEyes is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThousandEyes writes "Reliable. simple to set up, and offers fast monitoring capabilities". SCOM is most compared with Dynatrace, Zabbix, Datadog, Nagios XI and AppDynamics, whereas ThousandEyes is most compared with Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Accedian Skylight, Dynatrace, SolarWinds NPM and AppDynamics. See our SCOM vs. ThousandEyes report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.