SecurityScorecard vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SecurityScorecard Logo
2,157 views|1,220 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Tenable Logo
13,052 views|10,471 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SecurityScorecard and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, BitSight and others in IT Vendor Risk Management.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Vendor Risk Management Report (Updated: June 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process.""One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements.""The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities.""With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."

More SecurityScorecard Pros →

"The initial setup is very straightforward.""The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities.""The price of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is reasonable as it is ten times cheaper than other options.""The vulnerability scanning is the most important aspect of the solution for us.""It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities.""I would rate Tenable's dashboards and reporting capabilities for illustrating security posture a nine out of ten, with ten being the best.""It is a very, very user-friendly tool...The setup is easy""It is quite straightforward to set up."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pros →

Cons
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions.""They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product.""There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for.""SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."

More SecurityScorecard Cons →

"The stability has room for improvement.""There needs to be better dashboard navigation.""An area of improvement for this solution is being able to customize the dashboard. For example, the dashboard does not allow us to view a previous months vulnerability results alongside current results to make comparisons.""I would like the solution to cover the whole cycle of mitigation since it's an area where the solution currently lacks.""They should include better customization of the dashboard, and integration tools.""We'd like to see a bit more user-friendliness.""I'm not satisfied with the reporting structure.""The solution must provide penetration testing."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing could be split into a lower-paid tier for smaller organizations and another higher tier for others with a more security-focused outlook. $1000 per month is more than some companies pay for their internet connections in total. UPDATE: they have a new 400$ a month tier for starters."
  • "Even though it's competitive, they offer flexible pricing structures."
  • More SecurityScorecard Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There are additional features that can be licensed for an additional cost."
  • "The solution is not too expensive."
  • "Tenable.io Vulnerability Management's pricing solution model isn't great."
  • "The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."
  • "Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."
  • "Tenable.io is not known for being a cheap product."
  • "A yearly payment has to be made toward the solution's licensing costs."
  • More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements.
    Top Answer:Similar to Barracuda, SecurityScorecard's list price may appear high initially. Even though it's competitive, they offer flexible pricing structures.
    Top Answer:They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product. At present, we have to answer multiple questions for the suppliers manually. They could automate functionality to enhance… more »
    Top Answer: Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,157
    Comparisons
    1,220
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    700
    Rating
    8.0
    2nd
    Views
    13,052
    Comparisons
    10,471
    Reviews
    28
    Average Words per Review
    453
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tenable.io
    Learn More
    Overview

    Funded by world-class investors including Evolution Equity Partners, Silver Lake Partners, Sequoia Capital, GV, Riverwood Capital, and others, SecurityScorecard is the global leader in cybersecurity ratings with more than 12 million companies continuously rated. Founded in 2013 by security and risk experts Dr. Aleksandr Yampolskiy and Sam Kassoumeh, SecurityScorecard’s patented rating technology is used by over 25,000 organizations for enterprise risk management, third-party risk management, board reporting, due diligence, cyber insurance underwriting, and regulatory oversight. SecurityScorecard continues to make the world a safer place by transforming the way companies understand, improve and communicate cybersecurity risk to their boards, employees and vendors. Every organization has the universal right to their trusted and transparent Instant SecurityScorecard rating. For more information, visit securityscorecard.com or connect with us on LinkedIn.

    Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

    Sample Customers
    TriNet, USAA, Zurich, Gilt Groupe, McGraw Hill Financial
    Global Payments AU/NZ
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Educational Organization11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Security Firm24%
    Government12%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise58%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise34%
    Large Enterprise48%
    Buyer's Guide
    IT Vendor Risk Management
    June 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, BitSight and others in IT Vendor Risk Management. Updated: June 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Tenable Nessus and Rapid7 InsightVM, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management.

    We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.