We performed a comparison between Snyk and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."The most valuable features are their GitLab and JIRA integrations. The GitLab integration lets us pull projects in pretty easily, so that it's pretty minimal for developers to get it set up. Using the JIRA integration, it's also pretty easy to get the information that is generated, as a result of that GitLab integration, back to our teams in a non-intrusive way and in a workflow that we are already using."
"It's very easy for developers to use. Onboarding was an easy process for all of the developers within the company. After a quick, half-an-hour to an hour session, they were fully using it on their own. It's very straightforward. Usability is definitely a 10 out of 10."
"Provides clear information and is easy to follow with good feedback regarding code practices."
"Snyk helps me pinpoint security errors in my code."
"Snyk is a good and scalable tool."
"The advantage of Snyk is that Snyk automatically creates a pull request for all the findings that match or are classified according to the policy that we create. So, once we review the PR within Snyk and we approve the PR, Snyk auto-fixes the issue, which is quite interesting and which isn't there in any other product out there. So, Snyk is a step ahead in this particular area."
"The solution's vulnerability database, in terms of comprehensiveness and accuracy, is very high-level. As far as I know, it's the best among their competitors."
"The solution's Open Source feature gives us notifications and suggestions regarding how to address vulnerabilities."
"I would rate Tenable's dashboards and reporting capabilities for illustrating security posture a nine out of ten, with ten being the best."
"The tool has an easy-to-use interface."
"The initial setup is mostly straightforward."
"They are on a good trajectory as a company and investing in R&D in the right ways."
"The vulnerability management itself is the most valuable feature as well as references to the mitigation techniques."
"The solution is very simple to use."
"The vulnerability scanning is the most important aspect of the solution for us."
"It is pretty stable. I would rate it nine or maybe ten."
"We were using Microsoft Docker images. It was reporting some vulnerabilities, but we were not able to figure out the fix for them. It was reporting some vulnerabilities in the Docker images given by Microsoft, which were out of our control. That was the only limitation. Otherwise, it was good."
"I would like to give further ability to grouping code repositories, in such a way that you could group them by the teams that own them, then produce alerting to those teams. The way that we are seeing it right now, the alerting only goes to a couple of places. I wish we could configure the code to go to different places."
"One area where Snyk could improve is in providing developers with the line where the error occurs."
"Snyk's API and UI features could work better in terms of speed."
"The solution's reporting and storage could be improved."
"We have to integrate with their database, which means we need to send our entire code to them to scan, and they send us the report. A company working in the financial domain usually won't like to share its code or any information outside its network with any third-party provider."
"It can be improved from the reporting perspective and scanning perspective. They can also improve it on the UI front."
"We use Bamboo for CI.CD, and we had problems integrating Snyk with it. Ultimately, we got the two solutions to work together, but it was difficult."
"I'm not satisfied with the reporting structure."
"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"The pricing of the solution could be more reasonable."
"It would be helpful if Tenable could be more clear with regard to everything the solution can and cannot do with the particular license that you have."
"The product is a bit expensive."
"The price could be lower."
"The solution must be promoted more in the market."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Snyk is ranked 4th in Application Security Tools with 41 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. Snyk is rated 8.2, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Snyk writes "Performs software composition analysis (SCA) similar to other expensive tools". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Snyk is most compared with SonarQube, Black Duck, GitHub Advanced Security, Fortify Static Code Analyzer and Veracode, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Armis.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
