We performed a comparison between SonarQube and Sonatype Repository Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product itself has a friendly UI."
"SonarQube is designed well making it easy to use, simple to identify issues and find solutions to problems."
"The fact that the solution does security scanning is valuable."
"It helps our developers work more efficiently as we can identify things in a code prior to it being pushed to where it needs to go."
"This has improved our organization because it has helped to find Security Vulnerabilities."
"The features of SonarQube that I find most valuable for identifying code smells are its comprehensive code analysis capabilities, which cover various aspects of code sustainability."
"Using SonarQube benefits us because we are able to avoid the inclusion of malware in our applications."
"Issue Explanations: Documentation with detailed samples. Helps in growing technical knowledge and re-writing logic to conforming solutions."
"Another thing that I like about Sonatype is that if you download something today, and five days from today it becomes vulnerable, it will notify you."
"The product's network and intrusion protection features are valuable. It also has rules and compliance features for security."
"During the setup process, we only had one issue related to the number of available files. To perform the analysis, you have quite a lot of available file handles, so we had to increase that limit."
"We found a solution with dynamic testing, and are looking to find a solution that can be used for both types of testing."
"There could be better integration with other products."
"Having performance regression would be a helpful add on or ability to be able to do during the scan."
"It would be a great add-on if SonarQube could update its database for vulnerabilities or plugging parts."
"Lacks sufficient visibility and documentation."
"We did have some trouble with the LDAP integration for the console."
"I have found this solution creates more noise than competitors."
"What I don't like is the lack of an option to pick up the phone and call someone for support. That is something they need to improve on. They need to have a professional services package, or they need to include that option with their services."
"The tool needs to improve its file systems. The product should also include zero test feature."
SonarQube is ranked 1st in Application Security Tools with 112 reviews while Sonatype Repository Firewall is ranked 34th in Application Security Tools with 3 reviews. SonarQube is rated 8.0, while Sonatype Repository Firewall is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sonatype Repository Firewall writes "You will get clean code every time, and that's a great achievement". SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx One, SonarCloud, Coverity, Veracode and Snyk, whereas Sonatype Repository Firewall is most compared with JFrog Xray, Cisco Secure Firewall, Black Duck, GitHub and Veracode. See our SonarQube vs. Sonatype Repository Firewall report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.