We performed a comparison between Sophos Cyberoam UTM and Sophos UTM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."SD-WAN and IPSec features are valuable to me."
"The interface is user-friendly."
"The solution is excellent for web and application filtering and remote access with the VPN."
"You can geofence yourself if there is an incoming attack or a continuous ping from a company outside your country."
"The main features I have found best are the load balancer and ease of use."
"In some circumstances, the malware functionality is the most important feature, and in other cases, some other features."
"I like the SSL VPN connection. Cyberoam works well for controlling users and authenticating their connection to the internet."
"Its portal is user-friendly. I am able to manage the user data and access control through this device."
"Good basic firewall functions with advanced firewall scanning."
"It gives us the ability to manage our firewalls from the cloud and deploy a unified configuration onto them. Other competitors like Meraki have that ability, but they fail to optimize it in the way that Sophos has."
"The stability of Sophos UTM is very good. The solution has been stable since Sophos took over Cyberoam which was the original company providing this solution."
"Sophos UTM's best feature is SIM in the cloud, which combines the gateway solution and endpoint solution to send telemetry data to the cloud and provides full contact visibility regarding security."
"It has allowed us to design a bespoke cloud space for our clients, while still having an excellent level of protection."
"An easy solution to learn because the graphics are very intuitive."
"The three most important features for us are web protection, web server protection, and network protection."
"Sophos UTM has a good user interface and granular security controls."
"The implementation policy needs improvment."
"The solution is at its end of life and some of the appliances are finishing."
"There are some issues with logs and report limitations."
"Smaller CR15 units don’t have a hard disc or built in IView software. These units could do with that feature."
"I would like to see improvements in the development of reports. The process needs to be made simple."
"Sophos Cyberoam UTM could improve by adding VPN site-to-site capabilities. The correct version does not work with Microsoft Azure Cloud."
"The solution should improve its scalability because it cannot support enterprise networks."
"I would like to see a better content management pack and also the website searching should be better."
"This product could use some improvement with web filtering. It takes a lot of time and effort to set up and maintain."
"I would like this solution to support ICAP. Also, they no longer support on-premises management, and are forcing clients to use centralized management via the cloud, which I don't agree with."
"The interface configuration could be improved."
"The solution could be improved by adding cloud soundboxing."
"There needs to be some improvement in the IPsec VPN. There is implementation only support. I have version one. I'd be most interested in having IP version two from the protocol."
"The management suite is easy and the agent is easy to develop."
"The application control is really bad. It needs a lot of enhancements. The traffic shaping and bandwidth control, and application control need a lot of work."
"We had some problems with the configuration. They had provided a CloudFormation template, and we had to go several rounds to make it work."
Sophos Cyberoam UTM is ranked 7th in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 81 reviews while Sophos UTM is ranked 1st in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 110 reviews. Sophos Cyberoam UTM is rated 8.0, while Sophos UTM is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Sophos Cyberoam UTM writes "Stable and has a straightforward setup; reporting is fast and easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos UTM writes "It's a highly stable platform with very few hardware issues". Sophos Cyberoam UTM is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Secure Firewall, Netgate pfSense, Juniper SRX Series Firewall and SonicWall NSa, whereas Sophos UTM is most compared with Netgate pfSense, Fortinet FortiGate, Sophos XG, OPNsense and Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls. See our Sophos Cyberoam UTM vs. Sophos UTM report.
See our list of best Unified Threat Management (UTM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.