We performed a comparison between Tenable Cloud Security and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ease of use of the platform is very nice."
"It is pretty easy to integrate with this platform. When properly integrated, it monitors end-to-end."
"Cloud Native Security has helped us with our risk posture and securing our agenda. It has been tremendous in terms of supporting growth."
"It's positively affected the communication between cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams."
"It is advantageous in terms of time-saving and cost reduction."
"PingSafe's integration is smooth. They are highly customer-oriented, and the integration went well for us."
"Cloud Native Security is user-friendly. Everything in the Cloud Native Security tool is straightforward, including detections, integration, reporting, etc. They are constantly improving their UI by adding plugins and other features."
"The management console is the most valuable feature."
"The solution’s vulnerability management feature has helped us identify and mitigate risks well."
"The tool alerts us on depreciating performance or deficiencies of our web application. It helps us react on time."
"The key benefit lies in having the largest and most up-to-date database. When it comes to using any Tenable product, it excels in finding vulnerabilities and providing analytics."
"If you have multi-cloud tenancy using AWS and Azure, you can have a single dashboard where you can onboard all the cloud infrastructure and have visibility into it."
"Ermetic can provide super visibility for our cloud environment (we are using AWS)."
"The product's visibility and remediation work fine for me."
"It is quite straightforward to set up."
"The interface is fine."
"They are on a good trajectory as a company and investing in R&D in the right ways."
"The tool has an easy-to-use interface."
"You can customize each point in new scans."
"The solution can integrate with third parties and meets standard compliance."
"The best feature of the solution is the amount of visibility it provides of the vulnerabilities."
"The solution provides seamlessness, a perfect UI, and identity management for office operations. We are most vulnerable to users. Therefore, it is crucial to implement the right solution to ensure proper user access and resource management."
"PingSafe can improve by eliminating 100 percent of the false positives."
"It took us a while to configure the software to work well in this type of environment, as the support documents were not always clear."
"The integration with Oracle has room for improvement."
"Scanning capabilities should be added for the dark web."
"They need more experienced support personnel."
"They can work on policies based on different compliance standards."
"In terms of ease of use, initially, it is a bit confusing to navigate around, but once you get used to it, it becomes easier."
"I export CSV. I cannot export graphs. Restricting it to the CSV format has its own disadvantages. These are all machine IP addresses and information. I cannot change it to the JSON format. The export functionality can be improved."
"If Tenable Cloud Security offers a complete Cnapp solution with CWP, CIEM, and Waap security, it will be able to compete with other competitors."
"There is a need for the support team to improve their response time since it is one of the areas where the product's technical team has certain shortcomings."
"I do think there might be room for more integrations. This could allow for further customization and flexibility, essentially offering different functionality options to accommodate various budgets."
"Ermetic needs to improve its security scanning. I would like to see more dynamic graphical forms."
"The product must provide more features."
"I didn't find anything that wasn't useful or needed to be added."
"The shortcoming of the solution that needs improvement is related to its capability to do vulnerability assessments on applications."
"The product is a bit expensive."
"The user interface could be improved by being able to change the user interface to fit your position or your job. The graphs are set in stone and you can only print reports."
"They should include better customization of the dashboard, and integration tools."
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management could be improved with an increased number of dashboards and MSSP integration."
"The pricing of the solution could be more reasonable."
"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."
"The product could be easier to set up on the cloud."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Tenable Cloud Security is ranked 15th in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) with 6 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. Tenable Cloud Security is rated 8.6, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Tenable Cloud Security writes "Provides excellent features and helps identify and mitigate risks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Tenable Cloud Security is most compared with Wiz, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Microsoft Entra Permissions Management, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management. See our Tenable Cloud Security vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
We monitor all Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
