Splunk Enterprise Security Reviews

I utilize Splunk Enterprise Security to gather logs, and subsequently, I provide the team with access to the servers through a change management ticket or incident. I wasn't involved in the installation process during my tenure as a Windows server lead. I also verify whether all our actions adhere to the compliance framework.

Our deployment of Splunk Enterprise Security was all on-premises.

The visibility that Splunk Enterprise Security provides is beneficial and valuable.

Splunk Enterprise Security helped analyze malicious activities.

With Splunk Enterprise Security we were able to detect threats faster.

Splunk Enterprise Security contributed to a reduction in alert volume as our employees became aware of being monitored and ceased accessing the server without proper authorization.

Splunk Enterprise Security has significantly accelerated our security investigations by centralizing all log data and enabling us to quickly retrieve the necessary information through simple queries.

The most valuable features are the logs, which allow us to identify what happened and who interacted with the web repository.

Some of the queries are difficult to run and have room for improvement.

I am currently using Splunk Enterprise Security. 

I would rate the stability of Splunk Enterprise Security ten out of ten. We have never had an issue with stability.

Splunk Enterprise Security is scalable.

Splunk Enterprise Security's resilience is a valuable asset.

Organizations seeking a more affordable solution should first carefully evaluate their specific business requirements. While cheaper alternatives exist, they may lack the necessary features to adequately address their security needs. In such cases, Splunk Enterprise Security could be a more suitable option.

Splunk Enterprise Security is a worthwhile investment given the comprehensive range of features it offers.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security eight out of ten.

I recommend Splunk Enterprise Security.

I utilize Splunk Enterprise Security to create alerts within various use cases, including data onboarding, gap analysis, and business testing. I ensure that the use cases adhere to the defined criteria and address any changes or requirements raised by the client. Additionally, I handle any necessary backend modifications in Splunk by deploying code to appropriate environments, including the production environment.

We implemented Splunk Enterprise Security to capture more effective alerts. We create alerts to utilize advanced filtering capabilities. Additionally, we employ Sentinel as our endpoint security application. I have created all instances of the query as intended and have mapped them to Splunk. However, the corresponding alert is not being generated. These are the areas that require attention.

My expertise lies in Splunk Cloud and Azure. While I have worked with AWS in the past for a short period, my current focus is on GCP and Splunk Cloud. My responsibilities involve troubleshooting, alert verification, and key generation. Based on specific requirements, I employ my self-generated queries to identify the relevant fields, such as email or location. Next, I implement lookup conditions and pinpoint the table containing the desired field type. This process allows me to determine the specific requirement of the use case and define the search parameters accordingly. Finally, I conduct a time-bound search to identify any defects.

I deploy to Splunk Cloud, GCP, and on-premises environments. I have experience working with both platforms. When working on the cloud, we don't have the same level of visibility as we do on-premises. For example, we cannot directly access the fraud department systems. In the cloud, we must make all changes and deployments through the Splunk UI. This is relatively straightforward, as there is no backend to manage. However, it requires a thorough understanding of the configuration files and the data fields we need to modify.

We manage multiple cloud environments, including Splunk Cloud and GCP. Splunk Enterprise Security dashboards make it easy to monitor these environments seamlessly. We have a single user interface that allows us to log in to our account instantly and check for any issues, such as Data Collection Processor errors. This unified UI also provides access to the back end of both Splunk Cloud and GCP instances, eliminating the need to switch between different platforms. Whether we need to manage Splunk Cloud or GCP settings, we can do so directly from the UI, which is easy.

Splunk offers comprehensive visibility into our IT infrastructure. The only challenge lies in managing multiple user accounts. We need to create separate accounts for the UI, production environment, and staging environment. Additionally, if we have a DCP or a system cloud, we need to create corresponding accounts. Once that is done we can log in and use it.

Regarding Splunk Enterprise Security's insider threat detection capabilities, we receive an alert for every new case creation. If there is a high likelihood of a specific alert occurring, we have a corresponding use case in place to address it. We also receive soft tickets, which are potential alerts that may materialize in the future. These soft tickets are documented in Jira, and we continuously monitor them. By analyzing these alerts, we can identify potential issues. For instance, this morning, we received an alert for a new case with a missing application name. The interaction table contains the destination user account, process ID, process name, OS, and other relevant information, but the application name field is blank. We investigate this particular use case to determine the cause and timing of the alert. Since we are receiving the alert slightly earlier than expected, we consult the ticket for further details and substitute any missing information.

I have utilized the MITRE ATT&CK framework when the use case pertains to a specific data model. To comprehend the data model, we examine the processes involved or the fields that a particular tool utilizes. To achieve this understanding, we align the MITRE ATT&CK framework with the data modules. Subsequently, we extract the field name and field value. When dealing with ranges and incident changes, we must input the corresponding MITRE ATT&CK ID. This involves determining the tech ID and identifying the ID values associated with it.

Using Splunk Enterprise Security to analyze malicious activities and detect breaches is an efficient approach. When testing a use case, it's not necessary to manually enter the application name as it's provided automatically. Since the requirement is for SSO, we need to verify whether it's LDAP, Splunk Cloud, or AWS. Occasionally, irrelevant results may appear during data ingestion. We test for subscription-related issues and analyze the results. This testing process provides insights into the circumstances that trigger specific alerts. Malicious activities will undoubtedly be detected, and all our requirements will be met. Alerts are generated whenever unusual timeframes or activities occur. Various filtering criteria allow us to identify and capture specific user IDs or patterns within events. This capability proves to be highly beneficial.

The speed at which Splunk Enterprise Security detects threats could always be faster but it is designed to detect threats quickly. It uses various techniques, including queries, to identify and analyze potential threats. This allows it to produce faster search results than traditional methods, enabling us to locate the information we need more efficiently. While I cannot provide an exact percentage of how much faster it is, it is undoubtedly significantly faster. It can process thousands of events, ranging from twenty thousand to thirty thousand, in a very short period.

I've gained valuable knowledge from having to troubleshoot various situations. For instance, I've learned that the SIM needs to be flipped to use the new applications. Additionally, I've discovered that the error limit for event results should be increased beyond 10,000 because the source type values have increased significantly. This ensures that alerts are received even when there are large volumes of data. Furthermore, I've learned that some clients have different index limit requirements. Some clients require a seven-day index limit due to licensing restrictions or data ingestion considerations. Those who have the larger license opt for a 15 or 30-day index limit. In these cases, the large amount of data generated can necessitate a 1TB or higher index size limit. These learning experiences have been invaluable in my work, and I'm constantly encountering new scenarios that expand my knowledge base.

Splunk Enterprise Security has helped speed up our security investigations. 

The best part of Splunk Enterprise Security is its customizable settings. We can modify the front-end interface, data sources, and various other aspects to suit our specific needs. This flexibility makes it extremely user-friendly and convenient.

Apart from its customizable settings, Splunk Enterprise Security also offers a range of other advantages. It enables us to easily analyze logs, use field queries, and perform other tasks without requiring any extensive training. The search function is intuitive and straightforward, making it accessible to anyone.

The UI-based reporting dashboard is another highlight of Splunk Enterprise Security. It provides real-time visibility into important metrics and allows us to drill down into specific events for in-depth analysis.

Splunk Enterprise Security has not helped reduce our alert volume. We need to separate a few of the alerts, and if there is a time based on the priority, we put the time at what time it needs to appear every day or for seven days or more days. If an alert is present or if something is triggering, then it will be detected. However, the number of alerts that can be handled effectively depends on the specific use case. For each result that is affecting the system or for any specific issue, only those particular alerts should be generated. We can define a timer and determine how often checks should be performed. For example, weekly checks may be sufficient in some cases. However, if there are hundreds of alerts generated in a week, it may not be possible to handle them all effectively. Testing must be conducted to filter out unnecessary alerts. Therefore, clear boundaries must be defined in the use case when creating alerts.

The price for Splunk Enterprise Security is high and has room for improvement.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for two years.

Splunk Enterprise Security is an extremely stable product.

Splunk is compatible with a wide range of other products and is not constrained by specific configurations. Whether it's a single-sided or multi-sided cluster, whether it's used by a single team or multiple teams across different program locations, Splunk is flexible and adaptable. Data recovery is also a key feature, ensuring that data is never lost. This is one of Splunk's most significant advantages. Multiple indexes are maintained to safeguard data integrity, so even if one index fails, the data remains accessible to all users at all times.

Splunk Enterprise Security is scalable.

Comparing SentinelOne and Splunk, we've found that SentinelOne requires a thorough understanding of our processes, including their business context, process names, and all relevant conditions. In contrast, Splunk is more forgiving, allowing us time to learn and adapt. Additionally, SentinelOne's pricing structure can be more complex compared to Splunk's straightforward approach.

While Splunk offers ease of use, better visibility, and intuitive management, SentinelOne demands more technical expertise to implement and maintain. Splunk, on the other hand, provides granular control over event filtering, enabling us to retrieve detailed information based on specific criteria, such as Linux or Windows events. SentinelOne, however, may not provide the same level of precision, requiring more precise query formulation.

The initial deployment is straightforward. We only require the name and the value, and the process is very quick. We were already using GitHub, GitLab, and GitPass, so integration with Splunk was seamless. Splunk is compatible with all of these applications, which makes it a good fit for our needs. We are also using ServiceNow, and Splunk communicates seamlessly with it to raise tickets. The overall deployment time is minimal. One person can manage the deployment process, and I have completed 18 deployments myself. Each deployment takes one day to finish.

The cost is on the high end, which makes it difficult for some organizations to use. However, the benefits outweigh the cost.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security eight out of ten. While I have not explored all aspects of Splunk, I have found Splunk Enterprise Security to be a useful and reliable tool in the areas I have used. 

Splunk is deployed in one location. On our team that works on the SIM development team, we have 28 people who use Splunk Enterprise Security.

Splunk Enterprise Security necessitates ongoing maintenance. Tuning tickets are available, so we perform the necessary tuning, and if there is an outdated ticket, we make the required changes. I addressed a ticket from 2018 that required tuning. They requested certain additions, such as authentication or a new index, and maintenance is performed to incorporate these new features.

In multi-cluster environments, maintenance can be performed from different locations simultaneously. This feature is very convenient and allows for flexible maintenance scheduling.

I recommend Splunk Enterprise Security because it is a comprehensive solution for enterprise security. I'm currently working on the SIEM component, but the SIM is also available. Splunk offers various ways to search and configure, making it very easy to use, even without prior knowledge. We can seamlessly integrate Splunk into our existing workflows.

We use the product mostly just to pull out the reports, medical investigations, et cetera. As a security analyst, we can look at and pull data. You can make a central hub for a lot of different sources, including servers and endpoints. It makes it easy to check logs for every device connected.

If you are a data analyst, security analyst, or anyone who basically requires a set of data in your database job, and you have to have normalized data represented or, just to check for any patterns, this is quite helpful. With Splunk, you can pull in the data, you can transform it, and represent the data via graphs or pull the data and export it into Excel and perform further investigations. The use cases are quite deep. 

With this product, you can go for an in-depth search or just perform a surface-level search. There are different modes in which you can perform searches, and that basically defines the speed of how fast you can get the data. If you are going for a more detailed version offered, it'll take a bit of time. However, they'll give you more and more data. There's also a fast mode in it. 

The data which you can pull, you can basically visualize it, you can normalize the data, evaluate it, and convert the data into tables. It's much easier to pull the data, organize it, and normalize it as you are performing the searches. That's quite helpful.

I prefer working with cloud infrastructure like this as you can increase the storage capacity or the license at any time and search for a number of different endpoints. If you want to ingest more and more data, having something like Splunk available on the cloud is preferable. 

I take advantage of the incident response part of the solution. If anything happens at the endpoint, if anything happens at the user system, servers, or something like that, my role is to look into the logs, go through other investigations, perform a time scan, and create a timeline of all the events. This helps do that job.

I'm also aware they have a Mission Control. I have actually attended a few surveys on that, however, I haven't really implemented it due to the fact that we are in the middle of a few of the projects, and things are at higher priority as of now. So we haven't really focused on that.

Using Splunk, we can check out what server versions we have. If we just cross-check with the database, we can see if we have any availability and then we can pull in the files. If you have a database, you can perform a query to check for any particular problems in the entire environment. For the threat notifications, it's quite helpful.

Indirectly, it's helped us reduce our alert volume. If you have a list of files, you can run it through the environment and, based on that, create rules and exceptions. This indirectly helps reduce alert amounts. You can go through false positives and sort them out as well and create a rule against them. 

It's helped speed up security investigations. Being a central hub of logs, we can jump into a different log or source and jump into any investigation. You don't have to jump from one tool to another. This automatically reduces the investigation time. 

There are lots of free learning materials on their website. 

Overall, things are quite easy. It's a simple solution. 

I haven't explored beyond the security aspect as a data analyst. I haven't noticed any shortcomings so far. 

I've been using the solution for more than a year now. 

There are different modules, and I haven't activated all yet, however, the stability is okay. I would rate it seven out of ten. If we run into issues, there are materials they provide and online support. You can even call them. 

The solution is deployed to one location. It's deployed across the entire environment. 

The level of scalability depends on the license you have. You can expand or reduce it based on the environment. It does cost more money to scale, however.

I would rate scalability seven out of ten. 

Support is quite responsive. They also offer 24/7 support services. 

Positive

I previously used Palo Alto XDR. 

I also used an email solution whose name I can't recall. You could check emails flowing into or out of your environment.

I wasn't involved in the deployment; the solution was set up when I arrived. 

That said, I did go through some setup videos, and the process does not look difficult. They provide the steps for every aspect. There's also always support you can reach out to if you have questions. 

There may be some maintenance required in terms of upgrading. When you upgrade the version, you may need to upgrade your sensors on the endpoints. However, Splunk is quite compatible with other devices, so it's not difficult. In our company, the administrators handle maintenance. 

I haven't witnessed an ROI in terms of how I'm using the tool. 

It's mostly for EDR. You can cover servers as well; however, that requires additional licenses. Pricing is based on usage. As an EDR specialist, I interact with the tools and perform investigations. I don't deal with licensing directly.

This is quite new to me. I've only recently started working with Splunk. I used to work in EDR. It took me two to three months to understand the internal architecture of the organization, and based on that, I can use Splunk for all kinds of searches. So, how long it takes to realize the benefits of Splunk depends on the person and the complexity of the environment. 

I did not evaluate other options. I adopted this tool when I joined my current organization. 

We're a Splunk customer. 

To those considering just going with the cheapest solution, it depends on your level of comfort with support. If you have a cheaper tool, the support would be addressed. With Splunk, that's the difference - their support response. If you have a tool with a good license, you will be able to get immediate help if there's any vulnerability.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. 

I'd advise others to take time to learn the solution and develop skills. It's all about DSL queries. If you are off on queries, it won't give you any results. You need to be accurate with your SQL commands.

We use Splunk for log analytics, blocking dangerous files, etc. It helps to shape our security policies. Splunk is managed by our service provider, but we regularly get security insights from them.

I like the search feature and the indexing. It's very fast and comprehensive. It's easily tuned by your service provider, so I can quickly find the results I'm seeking. So it's very practical. We are working with the search feature and using multiple indexes that combine devices from different environments, so it's easy to collect information across environments. 

We can relatively quickly detect some malicious activities based on attack patterns and implement use cases configured by our service provider with help from Splunk. It improves the speed of threat mitigation because you can gather information about the attack patterns from a few days of online activity to block threats and take the necessary actions. 

We implemented Splunk at the end of 2020, so it's been around three years. 

Splunk Enterprise Security is scalable.

We have not been in direct contact with Splunk except for a workshop where I met a few of them. My impression was that they were skilled, experienced experts. They seemed helpful, so I had a good impression.

The service provider deployed Splunk, so I wasn't involved. I had heard that they experienced some difficulties setting it up, but I don't think it was harder to install than other solutions.

Splunk is very expensive. The license is based on the volume of the logs ingested. I was responsible for managing the contract with our service integrator. I don't know the precise details of the competing solution, but I have heard that Splunk is more expensive than others. I don't know what the going rate is on the market, but I think there are at least two competitors that are less expensive. We have experienced a few issues with our service providers in terms of log filtering and ingestion, so we continue to pay a bit more per day for our logs.

I rate Splunk Enterprise Security eight out of 10. 

The visibility that it provides is awesome. You can connect it to whatever you want and create whatever visibility you want. 

Its insider threat detection capabilities for helping our organization find unknown threats and anomalous user behavior are great. They have a lot of built-in capabilities for analytics, and they can provide a lot of visualizations and insights into whatever is being brought into it. The threat intelligence that is part of the platform itself is awesome.

In terms of actionable intelligence, it depends on what you bring to the table. The platform itself gives you the capability to make threat intelligence actionable, but if your feed is not good, it is of no use. There is a lot of noise within the SIEM. This is not on Splunk. This is on the SIEM, but Splunk does help to eliminate a bit of the noise and create a more cohesive view of the intelligence you digest.

Splunk is very good for analyzing malicious activities and detecting breaches. Its ability to connect things that are manually hard to connect is awesome. It is a bit lacking when you compare it to Microsoft Sentinel because Microsoft Sentinel already brought the SOAR solution, which in the case of Splunk comes at an additional cost. When I used it, they did have it quite expensive, but as a SIEM, if you compare Splunk to other SIEMs, it provides you with a great ability to detect and understand that you have something that is suspicious and anomalous within your network. Its ability to connect us to that otherwise cannot be connected by humans is very good.

It helps to detect threats faster, but I do not have the metrics. When it comes to reducing the alert volume, it is not Splunk. It is more of the analyst's work on top of Splunk.

Splunk definitely helps speed up our security investigations. It has the ability to connect and bring information with the click of a button. 

I have used Threat Topology and MITRE ATT&CK framework. It was very good for management but not so much for analysts' day-to-day work. It is a cool feature that helps you bring money from management, but it is not something that an analyst will use on a day-to-day basis.

The ability to digest any information and then correlate it in accordance with what you need is valuable. The ability to connect to pretty much everything and bring the information in the same format is also valuable. On top of that, we can use their language in order to create and customize the dashboards, correlations, or analytics that we want to incorporate. They also have a lot of out-of-the-box correlation that we can use, which is awesome.

They can incorporate the SOAR solution within the actual product so that we do not require two different products, two different installations, and two different pricing methods. In regards to UBA, I am familiar with the UBA that existed two years ago. I am not updated about it today, but two years ago, UBA required such an amount of data that from a cost perspective, it was not worth it. When you compare it to what you get out of the box with Microsoft Sentinel without additional costs, there is no match. 

I have been working with it for the past five or six years. 

It is very stable. I did not have any crashes or malfunctions. It does have a bit of a stretching point when you are doing a very large query or you are retrieving a lot of data. For example, when you are retrieving months of logs in order to conduct an investigation. However, that is at the edge of the product. On a day-to-day basis, it is very stable. It does everything that you need to do. We did not have any crashes in either of our implementations. We did not have anything major.

In the on-prem environment, it is scalable, but it requires work because you need to install indexes and forwarders. It requires more work from someone who is specialized in that domain, but in the cloud environment, it is super easy. It is very scalable. You can just grow as you need.

Their support is awesome. I would rate them a ten out of ten. It is not just the technical support. Their documentation is also good. The whole support system is awesome.

Positive

I used it in my last organization. In my current organization, we have adopted Microsoft Sentinel. I am creating a new managed service company, so it is going to provide service to multiple clients. We have multi-tenancy and full cloud environments and monitoring of on-prem solutions. When I implemented Splunk, it was not used for multi-tenancy. Their multi-tenancy was not that great. It was the old solution, but they now have the cloud environment that is more supportive of multi-tenancy, but with their on-prem solution, for multi-tenancy, we could just play with permissions. It was not the best. It was not proper multi-tenancy where you need different databases and different control planes. It was not the ideal solution, but now they have the cloud environment.

The experience that I had a few years ago was for on-prem, but now, I do have an implementation that is cloud-based. We are implementing it cloud-based for one of our customers. It is deployed on AWS.

The initial deployment is very fast. It is very quick. The on-prem can take a few days, and it is up and running. If it is on the cloud, it is already installed. You only need to connect all the source logs. The duration depends on the number of source logs. It differs. I had a project where I connected all my source logs in one week, and I had a project that took about four months, but the number of logs was different. The complexity was different. We had to create our own connectors and our own parsers.

The pricing is very complicated, and it is very pricey. You do require a lot of different licenses in order to get a comprehensive solution that is not just the SIEM solution.

To someone who is evaluating SIEM solutions but wants to go with the cheapest solution, I would recommend QRadar.

Overall, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten. There are several reasons for not rating it a nine or a ten because the pricing is very complicated, and it does require someone who is knowledgeable in the platform. You need someone who is specialized in that. Fortunately, I have these people, but when I tried to look for one in the beginning, it was not an easy job to find someone who was very skilled in this platform. Once you have such a person, it is awesome. You can do whatever you want. The sky is the limit. In fact, not even the sky is the limit. It does provide a very comprehensive solution. It does provide tons of flexibility. It is the platform that you should go for when you need something that is not ordinary or not your typical SIEM solution for a typical organization. It is the platform when you need something that will provide more. For example, one of the projects that I worked on was related to a SOC that needed to digest information from multiple organizations that already digest information, and we had to create cohesive use of that. In such a case, this is the platform to work with because it provides the flexibility that no one else provides.

Our customers utilize Splunk Enterprise Security for either their cybersecurity program or their data warehouse program.

Splunk Enterprise Security's threat detection capabilities are effective in assisting organizations to uncover unknown threats and identify anonymous user behavior. However, this effectiveness is dependent on using the UBA modules and having the proper infrastructure in place.

MITRE ATT&CK is the framework that we use to detect and track well-known threats. When there are well-known threats, we can utilize the MITRE ATT&CK to identify any anomalies.

Splunk Enterprise Security has its own routine and process defined for analyzing malicious activities and detecting breaches. Mainly, we baseline the client's business process and day-to-day activity and then use it to detect malicious activity through various scenarios.

Splunk Enterprise Security assists us in detecting threats more quickly. We have an abundance of unrelated and meaningless data from the raw logs, and the solution aids us in organizing and correlating this data so that we can extract meaningful events and take appropriate action. This is the primary objective for the majority of our clients. 

In most cases, we provide monitoring and intelligence to our customers based on how they use the solution. This allows other technical teams, such as PC, system support, and other tech units, to take appropriate actions. Our main role is to provide them with alerts and use case scenarios, while the detection and actions are primarily related to other aspects.

When we initially implement Splunk Enterprise Security, there are many alerts and false positives. However, with time, we are able to align our configuration with the client's requirements and do more baselining, reducing such issues.

Splunk Enterprise Security helps to expedite security investigations. Without a security solution, our security team is unable to identify threats because the log and auditing data are unrelated and uncategorized. Consequently, we cannot access them promptly. Therefore, having a solution like Splunk Enterprise Security is crucial for our cybersecurity program. For certain clients' needs, we prefer using open-source applications like ELK and ESK. However, if they opt for an enterprise and commercial product, Splunk is among the top three choices.

The most valuable feature is the DSS, also known as SPL, because it allows users to script advanced queries with limited knowledge.

The CIM model is the method Splunk uses to normalize data and categorize its important parts, but it is quite complex. Simplifying this process would assist security officers in assessing threats and using the system more efficiently.

I would appreciate it if Splunk could add the feature of importing and exporting from web servers and third-party devices during project and process development. This addition would greatly enhance the value of the solution making the maintenance for the security officer easier. 

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for six years.

I rate the stability of Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten.

Splunk Enterprise Security can be easily scaled once it has been installed and deployed.

Cyber threat levels are increasing every day, especially during the pandemic when most employees needed remote access to their business services. As a result, many organizations experienced a surge in attacks and required a resilient SIEM and cybersecurity solution.

I have used ELK, ESK, QRadar, Graylog, and LogRhythm in the past. One of Splunk's strengths over its competitors is its dedicated DSS called SPL.

The drawback of Splunk Enterprise Security is that upon initial installation, we need to do a lot of customization in order to have an effective cybersecurity program and deliver quality service to the client.

The initial setup is straightforward, but we need to make some configurations afterward that can be a bit complex. The deployment time depends on the size, but it usually takes several months to ensure stability and requires two SIEM engineers.

Splunk Enterprise Security is hardly affordable for most of our clients, causing many of them to resort to using open source solutions instead.

In addition to the licensing fee, there is also a support and maintenance charge.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten due to its high total cost of ownership, difficulties in maintenance, and the complexity of configuration immediately after deployment. 

Splunk Enterprise Security may not be cost-effective for small and even some medium-sized companies. While each organization has different requirements, we do recommend Splunk for medium and large organizations.

Organizations should take into account the complexity of their environment. For instance, if they have a purely vendor-based environment for their network security appliance, it may be easier for them to handle security, fabric, and architecture requirements. However, if they operate in a multi-vendor and mixed environment, they need to conduct more research on how to integrate various components. Often, they rush into negotiating their cybersecurity program without sufficient research, leading to potential problems for clients.

Splunk Enterprise Security provides more visibility into endpoints in our environment.

We only monitor AWS, but we also have SaaS services that are in our own clouds. So far, it is easy to monitor our cloud environment with this solution. As long as we ingest our data correctly and tune it, it will read it. It is very easy to use.

It provides end-to-end visibility into our cloud-native environment. This is critical for us because we are always one step away from a security incident, which could impact the company and cost a lot of money. That is our main point of focus.

It provides a risk score for each object, device, or user. We can then take action if they are at a higher risk.

The pricing can be better.

We have been evaluating Splunk Enterprise Security for the last eight months.

I cannot say anything about stability, but I am assuming it would be the same as Splunk. It is an app. It is going to work.

The technical support is above average, but they do not go into the details, so we have a contract with a third party to help us.

There might be more Splunk support tiers, but we are working with SP6. They will get their hands directly onto our Splunk environment, whereas Splunk support does not do that. Maybe there is a different tier that does that, but we do not have that. It is more of an email dialogue. They are not going to VPN into our environment. SP6 is more hands-on. I would rate SP6 a nine out of ten.

We did not use a similar solution. We have Carbon Black for endpoints, but this is going to be a lot bigger than that.

We are still evaluating it. We have not deployed it yet, but I was involved with the deployment of Splunk. 

It was very easy to set it up for evaluation. It is just an installer file. It is an add-on app for Splunk, and if you know how to install Splunk and add-ons, it is easy.

I am fine with the licensing, but in terms of the cost, it is expensive for the data that we have. We have an open discussion with our account rep about this.

We are not evaluating any solutions because we already have Splunk, and we do not want to leave Splunk. I like it, so it is just a matter of making the commitment.

The value that I get from attending Splunk Conferences is going to sessions and learning about what other people are doing and use cases that I have not really thought of. Also, I am able to talk directly to people about questions I have regarding our Splunk instances, and I can get some answers right away. It is very good to know what people are doing because sometimes we do something one way, but we do not know if we are doing it the right way. Here, we can get validation, or realize that we are doing it wrong and make the necessary changes. That is very valuable.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a ten out of ten. Most customers at the conference have already implemented it, except for our company. It is a critical foundation app that allows you to explore other apps that Splunk is grading, and it works.

We use Splunk Enterprise Security for security correlation and event management.

Splunk Enterprise Security is deployed as a hybrid model where the core component is on the cloud and is integrated with an on-premises solution.

Splunk Enterprise Security offers strong visibility through readily available use cases and supports integrations with most standard log sources. Its search capabilities are also commendable. Compared to other tools, Splunk Enterprise Security delivers superior visibility.

While we haven't integrated UEBA yet, it's in our plans. As a proactive monitoring solution, UEBA offers several benefits. It can identify Indicators of Compromise based on historical threat intelligence and generate alerts for suspicious activities. This allows us to potentially detect compromised accounts or ongoing attacks before they cause significant damage.

Splunk offers its threat intelligence service, which helps prevent IP replication and malicious threats. This information can be integrated or configured for our specific use cases, delivering more relevant and high-value insights.

Threat topology and MITRE ATT&CK are frameworks used to understand and analyze attack patterns and techniques, which can then be used to formulate and refine IOCs.

Splunk Enterprise Security's effectiveness in analyzing malicious activities or detecting breaches depends heavily on its configuration and correlation settings. Therefore, it's impossible to definitively label any tool as inherently good or bad. Ultimately, its success hinges on the organization's implementation. This includes onboarding the tool with the appropriate block sources for security detection, employing a sound risk assessment methodology, and aligning the tool's capabilities with both business and security use cases. When configured correctly, Splunk Enterprise Security can undoubtedly contribute to improvements in MTTD and MTDL.

Splunk Enterprise Security helps us detect threats faster. It allows us to define use cases, integrate with multiple threat feeds, and even connect to vulnerability solutions. In essence, by configuring all relevant log sources and defining appropriate use cases, we can achieve the primary objective of any SIEM solution: reducing mean time to protection.

Splunk Enterprise Security has reduced our investigative time by 25 percent by consolidating all logs into a central console. This eliminates the need to log into individual tools for log retrieval.

Splunk Enterprise Security helps reduce the number of false positive alerts.

In terms of monitoring capabilities, Splunk Enterprise Security performs adequately. However, its user interface requires training for efficient use. Compared to competitors like IBM QRadar, McAfee Nitro, and RSA Security Analytics, Splunk has a steeper learning curve, making it feel less user-friendly.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for almost four months.

We use a licensed third-party Splunk partner for support, and I haven't heard of any issues so far.

Compared to IBM QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security offers faster alert resolution. Its superior indexing and searching capabilities deliver quicker query results. While QRadar boasts a more user-friendly interface, Splunk provides numerous pre-built use cases that effectively reduce false positives and feature comprehensive application dashboards.

For instance, I encountered a use case unavailable in QRadar which appears to utilize the Cyber Kill Chain framework. MITRE ATT&CK enjoys wider adoption, and Splunk leverages this framework whereas QRadar persists with the Cyber Kill Chain. Additionally, Splunk integrates with a third-party app exchange, offering functionalities like vulnerability dashboards, threat intelligence, correlation dashboards, and EPS dashboards. This extensive library of applications caters to diverse business use cases. Users can install these applications as needed, making Splunk a highly customizable and feature-rich solution. Although undeniably expensive, its capabilities justify the cost.

While Splunk is a powerful enterprise tool, I'm new to it myself. I've heard Splunk is often preferred over other options, but the cost can be prohibitive for smaller organizations.

There are cheaper SIEMs available, but they require much more manual configuration, typically by developers with scripting knowledge. Splunk does not require this manual configuration, and its parsing, indexing, and visibility are superior.

Based on the limited time I have been using the solution and the feedback I have received from other users, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a six out of ten.

Without a SIEM solution, we rely on individual point solution consoles. For example, logging into a firewall reveals only local logs. Imagine the firewall detects suspicious IPs generating unusual traffic. Confirming this as a true or false positive is difficult solely based on firewall rules. Conversely, a SIEM offers multiple options for correlation. Say the firewall denies traffic, and threat intelligence identifies the source IP as malicious. Additionally, web server logs might show suspicious activity or bad actors attempting an attack. With multiple logs and threat indicators, the chance of false positives drops significantly. Correlation enables confirmation of genuine traffic versus malicious activity. Without a SIEM, pinpointing true attacks from false positives becomes challenging.