We performed a comparison between ActiveMQ and VMware Tanzu Data Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."For reliable messaging, the most valuable feature of ActiveMQ for us is ensuring prompt message delivery."
"I am impressed with the tool’s latency. Also, the messages in ActiveMQ wait in a queue. The messages will start to move when the system reopens after getting stuck."
"Message broadcasting: There could be a use case sending the same message to all consumers. So as a producer, I broadcast the message to a topic. Then, whichever consumers are subscribed to the topic can consume the same message."
"The most important feature is that it's best for JVM-related languages and JMS integration."
"ActiveMQ is very lightweight and quick."
"I'm impressed, I think that Active MQ is great."
"Most people or many people recommended using ActiveMQ on small and medium-scale applications."
"The ability to store the failed events for some time is valuable."
"After creating a RabbitMQ service, they provide you with a sort of web management dashboard."
"Reliability for the messages is key. RabbitMQ ensures your messages are safe. They are not deleted and stuff."
"The message routing is the most valuable feature. It is effective and flexible."
"We have been able to set up a messaging system that facilitates data integration between the software modules that we sell."
"Very sophisticated routing control and priority messaging capabilities"
"The solution is stable."
"The security is great."
"Simple and straightforward admin portals: Made it easy for users and worked out excellently for our requirements"
"I would like the tool to improve compliance and stability. We will encounter issues while using the central applications. In the solution's future releases, I want to control and set limitations for databases."
"There are some stability issues."
"It would be great if it is included as part of the solution, as Kafka is doing. Even though the use case of Kafka is different, If something like data extraction is possible, or if we can experiment with partition tolerance and other such things, that will be great."
"One potential area would be the complexity of the initial setup."
"I would rate the stability a five out of ten because sometimes it gets stuck, and we have to restart it. We"
"Needs to focus on a certain facet and be good at it, instead of handling support for most of the available message brokers."
"The tool needs to improve its installation part which is lengthy. The product is already working on that aspect so that the complete installation gets completed within a month."
"It does not scale out well. It ends up being very complex if you have a lot of mirror queues."
"VMware RabbitMQ's configuration process could be easier to understand."
"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."
"It will be very useful if we could communicate with other database types from Greenplum (using a database link)."
"If you're outside IP address range, the clustering no longer has all the features which is problematic."
"It doesn't have any GUI-based monitoring tools."
"Maintenance is time-consuming."
"The installation is difficult and should be made easier."
"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."
ActiveMQ is ranked 4th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 24 reviews while VMware Tanzu Data Services is ranked 3rd in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 81 reviews. ActiveMQ is rated 7.8, while VMware Tanzu Data Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ActiveMQ writes "Allows for asynchronous communication, enabling services to operate independently but issues with stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Data Services writes "Reliable queueing functionality and versatile tool that can be used with any programming languages ". ActiveMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, Anypoint MQ, Red Hat AMQ, Amazon SQS and Apache Kafka, whereas VMware Tanzu Data Services is most compared with IBM MQ, Anypoint MQ, Apache Kafka, Red Hat AMQ and Oracle Exadata. See our ActiveMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Services report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
