We performed a comparison between Red Hat AMQ and VMware Tanzu Data Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Red Hat AMQ's best feature is its reliability."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"Reliability is the main criterion for selecting this tool for one of the busiest airports in Mumbai."
"My impression is that it is average in terms of scalability."
"AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination."
"The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched."
"This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature."
"The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."
"Large amounts of data can be moved pretty fast using the solution."
"The product has been stable and I have never faced any kind of problems with it."
"The most valuable feature is that it's really customizable."
"The solution is stable."
"I like the high throughput of 20K messages/sec, and that it supports multiple protocols."
"RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the provided SDKs."
"The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure."
"There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated."
"This product needs better visualization capabilities in general."
"The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow."
"AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools."
"The challenge is the multiple components it has. This brings a higher complexity compared to IBM MQ, which is a single complete unit."
"There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly."
"There are several areas in this solution that need improvement, including clustering multi-nodes and message ordering."
"Red Hat AMQ's cost could be improved, and it could have better integration."
"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."
"Implementation takes a long time."
"The availability could be better."
"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."
"The product is pretty hard to configure."
"The product has to improve the crisis management, especially in memory issues."
"VMware Tanzu Greenplum needs improvement in the memory area and improved methods for quick access to the disc. So, one of the quick goals of Greenplum must work on enhancing access to the disc by adding hints in the database."
"Maintenance is time-consuming."
Red Hat AMQ is ranked 8th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 8 reviews while VMware Tanzu Data Services is ranked 3rd in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 81 reviews. Red Hat AMQ is rated 8.0, while VMware Tanzu Data Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Red Hat AMQ writes "A stable, open-source technology, with a convenient deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Data Services writes "Reliable queueing functionality and versatile tool that can be used with any programming languages ". Red Hat AMQ is most compared with Apache Kafka, ActiveMQ, IBM MQ, IBM Event Streams and Amazon MQ, whereas VMware Tanzu Data Services is most compared with IBM MQ, Anypoint MQ, Apache Kafka, ActiveMQ and Oracle Exadata. See our Red Hat AMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Services report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
