We performed a comparison between ADONIS and Appian based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a very complete solution."
"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."
"It is a stable solution."
"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"
"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."
"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."
"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."
"Process Modeling enables creation of business process workflows. You can create complex business workflows in a visual manner, and it is also easy to debug/monitor."
"It reduces development time in half making us more efficient."
"Technical support is helpful."
"It has very flexible adaptation and the ability to save and automate processes."
"The agile manner that we require to create our workflows. This is probably the most critical part of our solution and the time it takes to start processing the solution."
"It's a stable product."
"The most valuable feature is business automation."
"Technical support is quite responsive."
"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."
"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."
"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."
"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."
"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."
"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."
"When you update a page, the information on the quick links sidebar on the left side doesn't stay in the same place. It moves down, so you have to scroll to find it. That's not very user-friendly."
"A point of improvement would be the SAIL forms. The built-in tool used to generate forms does not have debugging support (to view local variables as they change on live preview, and step-by-step valuation) which is a big drawback for form development. Moreover, the script language used to build SAIL forms does not support inheritance or lambda expressions (functions as arguments of other functions), which makes the code base more verbose."
"The documentation needs to be improved."
"It is difficult to set up the on-premise version."
"I wouldn't say their response time is long, but it could be quicker."
"Architecture of product and scalabiility issues."
"Form creation and SAIL proprietary language still basically require programming. The claim a BA type can do everything is hogwash."
"The UI of Appian is more internal. Recently, there has been an addition of an external user portal for the customer-facing stuff. It's still coming out."
"I would like to see more features for enterprises. They would also benefit from adding documentation and training on their site."
ADONIS is ranked 17th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 7 reviews while Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 58 reviews. ADONIS is rated 7.8, while Appian is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ADONIS writes "A strong choice for business process modeling with an easy-to-use drag and drop approach". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". ADONIS is most compared with ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager, Camunda, Bizagi and ARIS Cloud, whereas Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Camunda, ServiceNow, OutSystems and Pega BPM. See our ADONIS vs. Appian report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.