We performed a comparison between ADONIS and ARIS BPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."
"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."
"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."
"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."
"It's a very complete solution."
"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"
"It is a stable solution."
"Business Process Analysis: We can simulate, optimize, and analyse business processes based on various business requirements. It assures our rolling out the best processes."
"ARIS is probably the most mature product in terms of modeling an enterprise architecture so that it has context."
"ARIS BPA has a good directory option, which helps to keep track of all of your metadata, and that's very useful."
"Visualizes processes which helps the business see pain points."
"The solution's basic features are easy to use, overall designed well, and it has good process mining analysis."
"Process Modeling or Process Mapping/Documentation. This is the most comprehensive tool for capturing the process details. Any organization who wants to embark on a BPM journey, process mapping/documentation, lays the foundation for the BPM led implementation."
"Object oriented modeling allows us to trace what's going on with the specified object."
"There is a module designer, that one is very powerful and it creates very good reports."
"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."
"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."
"When you update a page, the information on the quick links sidebar on the left side doesn't stay in the same place. It moves down, so you have to scroll to find it. That's not very user-friendly."
"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."
"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."
"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."
"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."
"The integration between ARIS, webMethods, and project versions needs improvement."
"The interface is a little archaic."
"The governance mechanism could be better, as could automation."
"I believe the solutions BPM tools are not very good and need improvements."
"I had a hard time with ARIS's access and licensing policy. It requires you to pay for each step you want to take forward with the solution."
"End-to-end visibility and real-time are areas that will need greater attention."
"The solution is difficult and not very exciting to learn."
"The usability. Others tools are easier to manage without same complexity that ARIS has."
ADONIS is ranked 17th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 7 reviews while ARIS BPA is ranked 6th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 64 reviews. ADONIS is rated 7.8, while ARIS BPA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ADONIS writes "A strong choice for business process modeling with an easy-to-use drag and drop approach". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". ADONIS is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, Camunda, Bizagi, BIC Platform and IBM BPM, whereas ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, Camunda, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Bizagi and Visio. See our ADONIS vs. ARIS BPA report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.