We performed a comparison between AirMagnet Survey and iBwave Wi-Fi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Modeling and Simulation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I would like to rate the product as eight of ten."
"Clear and easy to use maps."
"We use the solution for Wi-Fi and networks."
"It is reliable and easy to use (user-friendly). The heat mapping, passive network surveying, and doing the heat mapping of a building's wireless network allows me to see what level of coverage an area has."
"The most valuable features are the survey, spectrum analysis, and reporting."
"The benefit is with the ease of use of the software, I am able to show the customer, "Here is what your wireless coverage looks like." It is set up in a fashion that non-technical people can understand it."
"It allows us to prepare more real designs. Later, we validate them with actual surveys."
"The most valuable feature is the predictive survey. The antennas' RF patterns are reflected correctly on the drawing when preparing predictive heat maps."
"The stability and feature set of the application are top notch and can't be matched."
"I find the high-quality Heatmap generation, multi-floor, and wire mapping features to be most valuable."
"The solution's 3D imaging is amazing."
"Compared to other tools, iBwave Wi-Fi provides 95% accuracy and generates heatmaps."
"It can speed up design."
"iBwave Wi-Fi's tech support is great. They pick up their phones. I have no complaints."
"The 3D Coverage is a good feature that shows the signal propagation in three dimensions."
"The throughput should be more advanced in the future. They need to add more versions of WiFi than just one."
"It'd be nice if it was cheaper, however, you get value for your money."
"The surveying features are in need of improvement, along with general usability."
"When you conduct an active survey and then want to use it for design work, it's actually not very useful."
"The user interface needs a lot of improvement. The auto-placement of access points is not accurate."
"I would say some of our newer techs that are going out to job sites can be a little bit intimidated by the interface."
"But it's definitely a more expensive solution than other ones."
"AirMagnet Survey doesn't cover certain devices in the system."
"The cost of the solution could be improved. It's extraordinarily expensive."
"It would be good if we could involve a visual while designing the backhaul."
"Areas of improvement would include more functionality in the Mobile App, expanded reporting features, and some shortcut features."
"I am currently looking for an alternative due to my reluctance with the reliability of this product."
"iBwave Wi-Fi doesn't have a distributor feed platform."
"I would like to be able to see two buildings at the same time so that you can create a campus view."
"It would do iBwave well to become more involved with their clients."
AirMagnet Survey is ranked 2nd in Network Modeling and Simulation with 38 reviews while iBwave Wi-Fi is ranked 3rd in Network Modeling and Simulation with 11 reviews. AirMagnet Survey is rated 8.2, while iBwave Wi-Fi is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of AirMagnet Survey writes "It fixes so many problems quickly that we don't regret spending more on high-end tools than most companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of iBwave Wi-Fi writes "Feature-rich, excellent tool". AirMagnet Survey is most compared with Ekahau Site Survey, Aruba Wireless, AirCheck G3, Ubiquiti WLAN and Wireshark, whereas iBwave Wi-Fi is most compared with Ekahau Site Survey, RedSeal and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN. See our AirMagnet Survey vs. iBwave Wi-Fi report.
See our list of best Network Modeling and Simulation vendors.
We monitor all Network Modeling and Simulation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.