We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and Azure Red Hat OpenShift based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is easy to spin up resources."
"We can spin up the server anytime and have root access to it."
"The solution offers a low footprint. We don't have to come up with a data center ourselves. We basically don't have to own any hardware. We just rent a slice of their platform and we have everything we need."
"It's easy to manage. We can use a wide range of technologies with AWS."
"You can build and release applications quickly with AWS instead of waiting for months to get the necessary hardware. That's the real benefit. The time-to-market for developing applications is much shorter."
"Amazon AWS is very user-friendly."
"Macie is great. It is a service that makes recommendations on a data layer for cybersecurity. It is a great service."
"I like S3, load balancers, and Route 53."
"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."
"The solution's support and its automation tool that ensures we are secure and appropriately configured are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."
"It supports AKS and other projects like Kubernetes or EKS."
"It has a feature to automatically scale up or scale down. If my application is running in peak hours, it will automatically increase."
"The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability."
"In Kubernetes, when traffic goes out of a pod, it has to have its own IP address. Every service that's going out requires another IP. But with OpenShift, you don't have to deal with any of those IPs because they use NAT."
"In the next release, I would like to see better pricing."
"There should be improvement in terms of creating databases of varying sizes which would provide flexibility."
"The technical support should be better than what is on offer right now."
"At times we find ourselves a little trapped, with the lack of customization, for what we need."
"There are some limitations for certain applications that happen regionally and it is an issue for us."
"The IEM (Infrastructure Event Management) appears to be complicated, specifically cross-account resource permissions."
"When I try to enter the multi-cloud, they provide very poor support. Support is a concern with Amazon."
"Not all of the functionality is available in Europe and our customers in France want to be able to use features that are only available in the US."
"One of the things to notice is that this product can be expensive."
"The product is expensive."
"Automation could be improved."
"There is room for improvement in terms of orchestration. While Azure orchestration offers valuable features, it's worth noting that it may not match the level of orchestration provided by Kubernetes itself."
"They need to improve the core licensing model."
"Azure Red Hat OpenShift's support should be improved."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in PaaS Clouds with 250 reviews while Azure Red Hat OpenShift is ranked 10th in PaaS Clouds with 7 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Azure Red Hat OpenShift is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Red Hat OpenShift writes "Runs on every platform; makes it easy to adapt to Kubernetes". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, OpenShift, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas Azure Red Hat OpenShift is most compared with OpenShift and VMware Tanzu Application Service. See our Amazon AWS vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.