We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and Pantheon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Amazon AWS contains a lot of helpful services."
"Amazon AWS is good in terms of deployment and user experience. Their certificate management and load balancer are also good features."
"As a service vendor, we have helped clients to achieve faster "go to market" on their products, and have provided highly flexible cost-effective system management solutions."
"AWS is easier to implement than other solutions, and it's more reliable."
"The AWS feature that I most enjoy is Lambda functions. I primarily use serverless components because they allow you to process things without having to compromise on resources like when running EC2 instances or virtual machines. With minimal effort, you can scale up an unlimited number of processes, even concurrently, to process things. I frequently work with web APIs, so I use Lambda a lot in this area."
"The services that we are using have frequent updates, at least twice a year. They provide a new version that has more capabilities or features that fit our process and procedures."
"The most important feature is deploying our production in multi-data regions around the world."
"It has a dynamic scaling capacity which is very helpful."
"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."
"The product allows users to create multiple development environments."
"We would like the system documentation for configuring this solution to be improved, in order to provide better process clarity."
"The invoicing procedure of Amazon AWS needs to be improved. It can be difficult to manage."
"The features that should be improved are that there should be better clarity on their invoicing. There are so many things they charge for - high line items in the invoice. I think there should be more clarity and more ease of use with their billing. I'd like to see better ease of use of with the billing console and a clear dashboard to understand the usage."
"In future releases, I would like to see more automation."
"There is no control of downtime."
"One of the problems that I have seen is that some of the products are not as mature as others."
"One thing that Azure offers that I think is good is Migrate appliance. So, Azure has a migrate appliance that allows you to run against workloads to determine the cost, preparedness, and scalability. I haven't found a similar feature in AWS. That kind of service would be great on AWS too if you could point it to the data center."
"Pricing is the one feature everyone wants AWS to improve."
"The Multidev environment is very costly compared to other tools like AWS and GCP."
"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in PaaS Clouds with 250 reviews while Pantheon is ranked 20th in PaaS Clouds with 2 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Pantheon is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pantheon writes "The product is user-friendly and performs well, but it is very costly compared to other tools". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, OpenShift, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas Pantheon is most compared with Acquia Cloud, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform, GoDaddy and Cloudways. See our Amazon AWS vs. Pantheon report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.