We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and SAP S4HANA on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Great scalability."
"I like that it helps us do everything really fast, and its advanced services."
"The availability is good, you can get any service you need immediately."
"Cloud Management has been a valuable feature."
"User friendly solution."
"We found the solution to be reliable."
"AWS has a lot of flexibility, which is great."
"The storage is most valuable. The gateway and documentation are also quite good."
"Reporting transparency and user-friendliness are the key benefit of deploying SAP S4HANA on AWS. Furthermore, the solution offers a plethora of modules that have proven to be valuable, and there are regular updates available."
"The solution adds great value to any organization."
"The product’s high availability is its best feature."
"It is indeed a stable solution, but it depends on how you architecture the component in AWS. If the component has the right architecture and is properly provisioned and placed, then it will be a stable platform."
"SAP S4HANA on AWS is an easy-to-use solution."
"The most valuable features of SAP S4HANA on AWS are that it's simplified and the analytical capabilities are good."
"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA on AWS is the latency and speed. When we use the various typical relation database, the performance was visible."
"The product efficiently manages the data center without manual intervention."
"In future releases, I would like to see more automation."
"I think the price can be improved."
"There should be seminars and online training sessions available from AWS because a lot of people who are not using it would benefit from having the basic knowledge or basic hands-on experience."
"Faster API response times and an improved console experience would be better. Enhanced performance across APIs and the console would streamline our workflows."
"Some features may be better in Azure or some other portal. AWS could add some of those features."
"The dashboard can be improved a little bit to provide more information."
"The setup of the solution is not so easy, it requires various skills to complete it. The whole implementation can take a month."
"The pricing structure can be improved and made more straightforward."
"There are a few complexities when it comes to licensing that could be simplified."
"The product's implementation phase can be very complex for customers."
"The product could use more capabilities in the areas of robotics, machine learning and artificial intelligence, but these improvements are already on the way."
"The product can be very complex."
"S4HANA is expensive. It costs much more than SuccessFactors."
"The AI aspect of SAP S4HANA can be improved."
"I would like for them to have more integration with virtualization platforms."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 250 reviews while SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked 7th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 35 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while SAP S4HANA on AWS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S4HANA on AWS writes "With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, OpenShift, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas SAP S4HANA on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Alibaba Cloud. See our Amazon AWS vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.