Amazon EC2 vs Apache Spark comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
2,542 views|1,652 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Apache Logo
2,893 views|2,256 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon EC2 and Apache Spark based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Compute Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon EC2 vs. Apache Spark Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"There's a lot of encryption across the setups to ensure that database credentials and everything related to security are well managed.""The ability to quickly spin up instances on demand with zero upfront costs or infrastructure is the most valuable for me.""The scalability of the solution is fantastic. It's one of our favorite features.""The most valuable feature of Amazon EC2 is the computing capacity.""The scalability of Amazon EC2 is good. However, the stability can depend on what service I am using.""The most valuable features are the scalability options, low maintenance, and options to upgrade. AWS support is also pretty good. The generation upgrade is pretty simple and standardized.""The most important aspects are that the solution is scalable and easy to manage.""Amazon EC2 is really reliable and provides great flexibility."

More Amazon EC2 Pros →

"Now, when we're tackling sentiment analysis using NLP technologies, we deal with unstructured data—customer chats, feedback on promotions or demos, and even media like images, audio, and video files. For processing such data, we rely on PySpark. Beneath the surface, Spark functions as a compute engine with in-memory processing capabilities, enhancing performance through features like broadcasting and caching. It's become a crucial tool, widely adopted by 90% of companies for a decade or more.""The product is useful for analytics.""The most valuable feature of Apache Spark is its ease of use.""The tool's most valuable feature is its speed and efficiency. It's much faster than other tools and excels in parallel data processing. Unlike tools like Python or JavaScript, which may struggle with parallel processing, it allows us to handle large volumes of data with more power easily.""The solution is scalable.""ETL and streaming capabilities.""It is highly scalable, allowing you to efficiently work with extensive datasets that might be problematic to handle using traditional tools that are memory-constrained.""The solution has been very stable."

More Apache Spark Pros →

Cons
"Regional acceleration could improve. If I am hosting a website and I want the experience to be faster they should have this feature to allow for increased speeds.""It is a little too expensive.""If the solution was cheaper, if the price was less, it would be better.""EC2 is a little expensive.""The scalability could improve.""The availability and response time of the free technical support can be improved.""We have had some downtime using the solution.""My impression is that the scalability of this product could be improved. My opinion is that, for example, the Lambda solution is much more scalable than EC2."

More Amazon EC2 Cons →

"We are building our own queries on Spark, and it can be improved in terms of query handling.""This solution currently cannot support or distribute neural network related models, or deep learning related algorithms. We would like this functionality to be developed.""When you want to extract data from your HDFS and other sources then it is kind of tricky because you have to connect with those sources.""The logging for the observability platform could be better.""The setup I worked on was really complex.""It requires overcoming a significant learning curve due to its robust and feature-rich nature.""When you first start using this solution, it is common to run into memory errors when you are dealing with large amounts of data.""I know there is always discussion about which language to write applications in and some people do love Scala. However, I don't like it."

More Apache Spark Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing appears to be cheap, however, it is extremely difficult in calculating what something will cost."
  • "It has helped to reduce costs with infrastructure."
  • "EC2 pricing is somewhat transparent, in that AWS provides pricing for all instance types. However, the number of pricing options can be confusing."
  • "For our usage, the cost is approximately $20,000 to $23,000 per month."
  • "There is a license required to use this solution and we pay on a monthly basis."
  • "The price is reasonable, but there is definitely an opportunity to lower it in instances which are of a higher configuration, because they have been typically used for the long term."
  • "Amazon EC2 has a pay-as-you-use cost model."
  • "The clients have found the billing of Amazon EC2 good, but the price could be less high. There is a monthly subscription to use the solution."
  • More Amazon EC2 Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Since we are using the Apache Spark version, not the data bricks version, it is an Apache license version, the support and resolution of the bug are actually late or delayed. The Apache license is free."
  • "Apache Spark is open-source. You have to pay only when you use any bundled product, such as Cloudera."
  • "We are using the free version of the solution."
  • "Apache Spark is not too cheap. You have to pay for hardware and Cloudera licenses. Of course, there is a solution with open source without Cloudera."
  • "Apache Spark is an expensive solution."
  • "Spark is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
  • "On the cloud model can be expensive as it requires substantial resources for implementation, covering on-premises hardware, memory, and licensing."
  • "It is an open-source solution, it is free of charge."
  • More Apache Spark Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon EC2 is really reliable and provides great flexibility.
    Top Answer:The solution has different pricing models, and its cost differs when you purchase it for one year or three years.
    Top Answer:The solution’s pricing and downtimes could be improved. I would like to have a better pricing model for Amazon EC2 instances because it comes with different pricing models. The solution's cost differs… more »
    Top Answer:We use Spark to process data from different data sources.
    Top Answer:In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, and do the transformation in a subsecond
    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 16 in Compute Service
    Views
    2,542
    Comparisons
    1,652
    Reviews
    42
    Average Words per Review
    341
    Rating
    8.6
    5th
    out of 16 in Compute Service
    Views
    2,893
    Comparisons
    2,256
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    444
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    AWS Fargate logo
    Compared 63% of the time.
    AWS Lambda logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    AWS Batch logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Apache NiFi logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Google App Engine logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Spring Boot logo
    Compared 31% of the time.
    AWS Batch logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Spark SQL logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    SAP HANA logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    AWS Fargate logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud, EC2
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) is a web service that provides secure, resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale cloud computing easier for developers.

    Amazon EC2’s simple web service interface allows you to obtain and configure capacity with minimal friction. It provides you with complete control of your computing resources and lets you run on Amazon’s proven computing environment. Amazon EC2 reduces the time required to obtain and boot new server instances to minutes, allowing you to quickly scale capacity, both up and down, as your computing requirements change. Amazon EC2 changes the economics of computing by allowing you to pay only for capacity that you actually use. Amazon EC2 provides developers the tools to build failure resilient applications and isolate them from common failure scenarios.

    Spark provides programmers with an application programming interface centered on a data structure called the resilient distributed dataset (RDD), a read-only multiset of data items distributed over a cluster of machines, that is maintained in a fault-tolerant way. It was developed in response to limitations in the MapReduce cluster computing paradigm, which forces a particular linear dataflowstructure on distributed programs: MapReduce programs read input data from disk, map a function across the data, reduce the results of the map, and store reduction results on disk. Spark's RDDs function as a working set for distributed programs that offers a (deliberately) restricted form of distributed shared memory

    Sample Customers
    Netflix, Expedia, TimeInc., Novaris, airbnb, Lamborghini
    NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company17%
    University7%
    Educational Organization6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    University9%
    Marketing Services Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon EC2 vs. Apache Spark
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EC2 vs. Apache Spark and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon EC2 is ranked 3rd in Compute Service with 60 reviews while Apache Spark is ranked 5th in Compute Service with 60 reviews. Amazon EC2 is rated 8.6, while Apache Spark is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon EC2 writes "Easy to scale and valuable features include the security group and key management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Apache Spark writes "Reliable, able to expand, and handle large amounts of data well". Amazon EC2 is most compared with AWS Fargate, AWS Lambda, AWS Batch, Apache NiFi and Google App Engine, whereas Apache Spark is most compared with Spring Boot, AWS Batch, Spark SQL, SAP HANA and AWS Fargate. See our Amazon EC2 vs. Apache Spark report.

    See our list of best Compute Service vendors.

    We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.