Amazon EC2 vs Apache NiFi comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
2,542 views|1,652 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Apache Logo
3,672 views|1,791 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon EC2 and Apache NiFi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Compute Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon EC2 vs. Apache NiFi Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,567 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of Amazon EC2 is its ability to spin a new virtual machine in a few seconds.""The product is easy and quick to set up.""An advantage of Amazon is that it offers a wide range of infrastructure services with an easy way to configure them.""The scalability of Amazon EC2 is good. However, the stability can depend on what service I am using.""This is a user-friendly solution.""EC2 is flexible when we need to increase its resources (memory, boosting, and storage) based on our usage. That is the power of EC2.""The flexibility of the security features is what is interesting.""Amazon EC2 has plenty of scalability options to decrease or increase the number we need. Based on our bandwidth usage we may go for a higher or downgrade level. We can do it ourselves."

More Amazon EC2 Pros →

"The user interface is good and makes it easy to design very popular workflows.""Visually, this is a good product.""Apache NiFi is user-friendly. Its most valuable features for handling large volumes of data include its multitude of integrated endpoints and clients and the ability to create cron jobs to run tasks at regular intervals.""It's an automated flow, where you can build a flow from source to destination, then do the transformation in between.""We can integrate the tool with other applications easily.""The initial setup is very easy. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one point is difficult, and ten points are easy.""The most valuable features of this solution are ease of use and implementation.""The most valuable feature has been the range of clients and the range of connectors that we could use."

More Apache NiFi Pros →

Cons
"The only issue with EC2 is that it makes it difficult to install an LLS certificate on your WordPress website that you have deployed inside that virtual machine. That becomes complicated.""The solution is pretty expensive.""am concerned about the tool's data security.""Built-in and/or integration with other services to proactively identify potential failures before they occur.""Lacks sufficient tools to help users minimize their costs.""The initial setup could be easier because many keys are required for access.""The ease of migrating applications could be improved.""If the solution was cheaper, if the price was less, it would be better."

More Amazon EC2 Cons →

"The tool should incorporate more tutorials for advanced use cases. It has tutorials for simple use cases.""There should be a better way to integrate a development environment with local tools.""I think the UI interface needs to be more user-friendly.""More features must be added to the product.""There is room for improvement in integration with SSO. For example, NiFi does not have any integration with SSO. And if I want to give some kind of rollback access control across the organization. That is not possible.""The overall stability of this solution could be improved. In a future release, we would like to have access to more features that could be used in a parallel way. This would provide more freedom with processing.""There are some claims that NiFi is cloud-native but we have tested it, and it's not.""We run many jobs, and there are already large tables. When we do not control NiFi on time, all reports fail for the day. So it's pretty slow to control, and it has to be improved."

More Apache NiFi Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing appears to be cheap, however, it is extremely difficult in calculating what something will cost."
  • "It has helped to reduce costs with infrastructure."
  • "EC2 pricing is somewhat transparent, in that AWS provides pricing for all instance types. However, the number of pricing options can be confusing."
  • "For our usage, the cost is approximately $20,000 to $23,000 per month."
  • "There is a license required to use this solution and we pay on a monthly basis."
  • "The price is reasonable, but there is definitely an opportunity to lower it in instances which are of a higher configuration, because they have been typically used for the long term."
  • "Amazon EC2 has a pay-as-you-use cost model."
  • "The clients have found the billing of Amazon EC2 good, but the price could be less high. There is a monthly subscription to use the solution."
  • More Amazon EC2 Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's an open-source solution."
  • "We use the free version of Apache NiFi."
  • "The solution is open-source."
  • "I used the tool's free version."
  • More Apache NiFi Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
    772,567 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The scalability and elasticity are helpful.
    Top Answer:We pay a monthly subscription fee. The price can be improved.
    Top Answer:Accessibility must be improved. It is important to know how fast we can get to the solution. It would be nice if the interface would pop up without much loading. The product must be faster and more… more »
    Top Answer:I am using it open source, so it means it's free for me to use.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in integration with SSO. For example, NiFi does not have any integration with SSO. And if I want to give some kind of rollback access control across the organization… more »
    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 16 in Compute Service
    Views
    2,542
    Comparisons
    1,652
    Reviews
    42
    Average Words per Review
    341
    Rating
    8.6
    8th
    out of 16 in Compute Service
    Views
    3,672
    Comparisons
    1,791
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    565
    Rating
    7.4
    Comparisons
    AWS Fargate logo
    Compared 63% of the time.
    Apache Spark logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    AWS Lambda logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    AWS Batch logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Google App Engine logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud, EC2
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) is a web service that provides secure, resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale cloud computing easier for developers.

    Amazon EC2’s simple web service interface allows you to obtain and configure capacity with minimal friction. It provides you with complete control of your computing resources and lets you run on Amazon’s proven computing environment. Amazon EC2 reduces the time required to obtain and boot new server instances to minutes, allowing you to quickly scale capacity, both up and down, as your computing requirements change. Amazon EC2 changes the economics of computing by allowing you to pay only for capacity that you actually use. Amazon EC2 provides developers the tools to build failure resilient applications and isolate them from common failure scenarios.

    Apache NiFi is an easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.
    Sample Customers
    Netflix, Expedia, TimeInc., Novaris, airbnb, Lamborghini
    Macquarie Telecom Group, Dovestech, Slovak Telekom, Looker, Hastings Group
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Consumer Goods Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company17%
    University7%
    Educational Organization6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon EC2 vs. Apache NiFi
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EC2 vs. Apache NiFi and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,567 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon EC2 is ranked 3rd in Compute Service with 60 reviews while Apache NiFi is ranked 8th in Compute Service with 11 reviews. Amazon EC2 is rated 8.6, while Apache NiFi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Amazon EC2 writes "Easy to scale and valuable features include the security group and key management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Apache NiFi writes "Allows the creation and use of custom functions to achieve desired functionality but limitation in handling monthly transactions due to a lack of partitioning for dates". Amazon EC2 is most compared with AWS Fargate, Apache Spark, AWS Lambda, AWS Batch and Google App Engine, whereas Apache NiFi is most compared with Google Cloud Dataflow, AWS Lambda, Apache Spark, Azure Stream Analytics and AWS Batch. See our Amazon EC2 vs. Apache NiFi report.

    See our list of best Compute Service vendors.

    We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.