We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and Kubernetes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Initial setup is straightforward. It only takes 15 minutes to deploy."
"I like its auto-scale feature very much."
"The product's most valuable features are scalability, observability, and performance."
"We haven't faced any major issues in one and a half years of use."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"I like the scalability they're currently providing. Integration was very easy. It was a good experience."
"The stability is excellent."
"Amazon EKS is very scalable."
"The most valuable feature of Kubernetes is automation. It is the best tool for automation."
"The solution is easy to use."
"I am impressed with the product's coupling of resources and flexibility."
"The most valuable feature is the support for Docker containers."
"All the current features are quite harmonic."
"Kubernetes has everything. Its design structure is quite advanced, and its offerings are extensive. The practical feature was the seamless failover."
"We use this solution for the hosting of micro-services. Kubernetes helps us to orchestrate all the containers hosting these micro-services."
"Kubernetes provides scalable clustering for containers and other means of deployment."
"I'd like to see the solution add a service catalog."
"The graphical user interface could be better."
"The management of the nodes in Amazon EKS should be improved."
"Amazon EKS is not a solution that can be fully managed through automation, making it an area of concern where improvement is required."
"Amazon EKS's vulnerability management of data could be improved."
"The dashboard needs to be more user-friendly."
"I would like to see it a little more stable, more operational, and more convenient to develop."
"I'd like improved traffic handling and additional application details within the system."
"Kubernetes should improve its consistency across different types of deployments. My customers tell me that they get much better performance when Kubernetes is deployed on VM versus PaaS services from Azure."
"We would to have additional features related to security within the API, instead of needing to install add-ons."
"The lack of native support for billing and self-service capabilities is an area Kubernetes could improve. This requires the use of third-party integrations or managed services in order for customers to be able to deploy clusters on their own. It would be beneficial to have these features built-in into the Kubernetes platform."
"Kubernetes is a complex solution. The product needs to be more manageable and user-friendly."
"It's complex to manage and requires specialists."
"The setup and operation of the product should be simplified."
"The solution does not work with third-party tools, or alternative cloud providers, which limits the extent that we can utilize it to."
"There are features in Google Cloud or AWS that aren't in Azure. They need to implement a couple more tools in Azure."
Amazon EKS is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 39 reviews while Kubernetes is ranked 4th in Container Management with 73 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while Kubernetes is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "Supports multiple tools and has a straightforward setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kubernetes writes "Container orchestrator that deploys our machine learning solutions". Amazon EKS is most compared with Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Linode, Rancher Labs and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, whereas Kubernetes is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, Google Kubernetes Engine and HPE Ezmeral Container Platform. See our Amazon EKS vs. Kubernetes report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
