We performed a comparison between HPE Ezmeral Container Platform and Kubernetes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management."If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."
"Kubernetes' most valuable features are scaling, deployment, and container management."
"Kubernetes has everything. Its design structure is quite advanced, and its offerings are extensive. The practical feature was the seamless failover."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The most valuable features of Kubernetes are the integration with Docker and there is plenty of documentation available. We work with Docker as a container, and it is more integrated with Docker than VMware Tanzu."
"There are features that come out of the box with Kubernetes, with respect to scaling, reliability, etc. It's the leading container management platform. There are other competing ones, but this is the leading one. It has multiple instances of the application running. If one of them goes down, the other one automatically spins up."
"The cloud-managed Kubernetes allow us to take care of a big system and deployment and container management without having a big operational team."
"The Desired State Configuration is a handy feature; we can deploy a certain number of pods, and the tool will ensure that the state is maintained in our desired configuration."
"It has a complete loading feature set for replica site deployment."
"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."
"The initial setup of Kubernetes is difficult. However, if you are used to the flow then it is easier. The length of time it takes for the implementation depends on the project."
"The platform could be more convenient to use."
"Kubernetes is a complex solution. The product needs to be more manageable and user-friendly."
"The solution can be quite complex for many users."
"Kubernetes' VM functionality and security could be improved."
"The network policies and RBAC management across multi-clusters could be improved. This is an issue we're trying to solve in the market."
"I'm a beginner, and I recently started working with Kubernetes. As of now, I don't see any bugs. However, it would be better if it could be deployed without coding."
"The support could be faster at resolving issues."
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is ranked 17th in Container Management while Kubernetes is ranked 4th in Container Management with 73 reviews. HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is rated 7.0, while Kubernetes is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of HPE Ezmeral Container Platform writes "Easy to install with good support, but the deployment of applications could be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kubernetes writes "Container orchestrator that deploys our machine learning solutions". HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is most compared with Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, Amazon EKS, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Google Kubernetes Engine and Docker, whereas Kubernetes is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Amazon EKS, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform and Cisco Container Platform.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
