We performed a comparison between Amazon MQ and VMware Tanzu Data Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."
"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."
"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."
"The product has been stable and I have never faced any kind of problems with it."
"Some of the most valuable features are publish and subscribe, fanout, and queues."
"It is easy to use. The addition of more queues and more services can be managed very easily."
"The product's feature of data transaction works fast."
"The solution can scale."
"Pivotal Greenplum's shared-nothing architecture."
"The solution improved our site reliability."
"It's one of the fastest databases in the market. It's easy to use. From a maintenance perspective it's a good product. The segmentation, or architecture of the product is different than other databases such as Oracle. So even in 10 years, the data distribution for such segments will not affect other segments. The query performance of the product, for complex queries, is very good. It has good integration with Hadoop."
"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."
"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."
"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."
"They should add more analytics. Their documentation could also be improved so that I don't have to bother my co-workers and tech support so often."
"We needed to configure additional plugins. While it was relatively easy to do this on-premises, it became more challenging in the cloud."
"Initial setup is a little complex. It took around two weeks to deploy."
"I would like to see the performance of the administration portal improved and additional messaging protocols."
"One of the disadvantages, not a disadvantage with the product itself, but overall, is the expertise in the marketplace. It's not easy to find a Greenplum administrator in the market, compared to other products such as Oracle."
"Maintenance is time-consuming."
"The next release should include some of the flexibility and features that Kafka offers."
"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."
Amazon MQ is ranked 9th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 3 reviews while VMware Tanzu Data Services is ranked 3rd in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 81 reviews. Amazon MQ is rated 8.4, while VMware Tanzu Data Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon MQ writes "Provides you with a URL where you can either send or retrieve messages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Data Services writes "Reliable queueing functionality and versatile tool that can be used with any programming languages ". Amazon MQ is most compared with Amazon SQS, Apache Kafka, IBM MQ, Red Hat AMQ and EMQX, whereas VMware Tanzu Data Services is most compared with IBM MQ, Anypoint MQ, Apache Kafka, Red Hat AMQ and EMQX. See our Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Services report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
