Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
5,982 views|5,152 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
1,007 views|860 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 Glacier and Microsoft Azure Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,567 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product automatically replicates objects from a S3 bucket in one region to another bucket in a different region.""The data archive feature is valuable.""Amazon S3 Glacier can integrate seamlessly with other AWS services.""The pricing is low, and it's dedicated to archiving is valuable to us.""AWS does support the ability for user controlled movement of data between regions for business continuance (BC), high availability (HA) and disaster recovery (DR).""It is a very comprehensive tool.""The tool is simple to use and not very expensive.""AWS Lambda is the most valuable part of the solution because it gives you a code interface for everything."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Pros →

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is that it is on the cloud.""The key feature for us is the possibility to have a copy of our data and machines outside of our premises just in case of a disaster.""Microsoft Azure Object Storage provides a platform for uploading or downloading big datasets.""It is a stable solution and serve our purposes""We have had a good experience with customer service and support.""The most valuable feature of Azure Object Storage for us is its simplicity and reliability as a storage solution.""Object Storage's best features are the soft delete option and the retention period.""The solution integrates well with Microsoft Office 365 and includes important features such as SIEM, storage, SQL, and Cosmos DB."

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Pros →

Cons
"The stability must be improved.""The pricing is a bit expensive. There is room for improvement in costs.""The solution's cloud storage is very expensive, and users may not be able to afford cloud storage.""Amazon S3 Glacier is a cheaper tool if you're running it on-prem, but it is expensive if deployed on the cloud.""They can improve data discovery.""The product needs to improve cloud security.""The user experience must be improved.""The product’s pricing must be improved."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Cons →

"We've seen some performance issues with Azure Table storage. It's quite slow. The performance surrounding it should be improved to speed things up a bit.""Microsoft Azure Object Storage is a pretty expensive solution.""The initial setup is not easy to understand.""The administration of the solution is not as easy as we would like it to be.""A more comprehensive training option is needed.""The solution needs to improve the custom domain integration with static web pages. Even though Blog Storage is providing the static content hosting feature, due to the custom domain availability, the integration is not available. In most cases, we withdraw from that service and use our app service to host our static data feeds.""Our current Azure setup faces challenges with API connectivity, particularly due to misconfigurations related to changes in Azure Graph.""Microsoft Azure Object Storage has had a number of failures last week due to the lack of hardware available to support the resources. However, it was only for a short time, approximately two days."

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is much cheaper than competing products."
  • "There is no license, you pay for what you use."
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "The product is cheap."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is expensive."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving."
  • "The pricing must be improved."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is very cheap, but the cost becomes a concern when you have a very large amount of data."
  • More Amazon S3 Glacier Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost is based on the amount of traffic and we paid approximately 18 lakh Rupees ($25,000 USD) last year."
  • "For the cloud, you get charges every day if you are going to download anything, besides the cost for storage those charges are always there."
  • "The cost of this solution is high compared to others, although there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
  • "The cost should be reduced to make it more competitive."
  • "Pricing is always confusing for all Microsoft products. For this solution, they do provide the estimates, but it is not easy to guess the exact amount that we will be billed."
  • "We have a separate package and pay extra for additional technical support."
  • "The licensing cost of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is monthly. We have two types of licenses. One is the EA enterprise license and the other is a CSP license."
  • "It has a pay-as-you-go model. So, you are only paying for what you store. It's an attractive model. You don't pay for a set; you pay for what you actually use."
  • More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    772,567 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, which… more »
    Top Answer:I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done in… more »
    Top Answer:I believe the usage reporting could be simplified, particularly for billing purposes. Overall, I find Amazon S3 Glacier's reporting system somewhat confusing compared to other hyperscalers in the… more »
    Top Answer:The tool has a pay-per-use pricing model. You need to pay for what you are consuming. It is not a complex model. It is not an expensive product. There is no need to pay extra money for the licensing… more »
    Top Answer:The product hangs sometimes. The password retrieval process was very difficult.
    Ranking
    Views
    5,982
    Comparisons
    5,152
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    360
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    1,007
    Comparisons
    860
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    375
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Glacier
    Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Azure Object Storage, MS Azure Object Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

    REST-based object storage for unstructured data in the cloud

    • Store infrequently accessed data in a low-cost cool storage tier
    • Store frequently accessed application data in a hot storage tier
    • Stream video, audio, and other media to web, mobile, or desktop applications
    • Power big data analytics
    • Access your data more securely, both over the wire and at rest
    Sample Customers
    King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud
    Umbraco, Xbox, Radioshack, 343 Industries, McKesson
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company42%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    Integrator4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization30%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    University5%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Logistics Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Retailer11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business58%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise43%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,567 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 2nd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 35 reviews while Microsoft Azure Object Storage is ranked 9th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 45 reviews. Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Azure Object Storage is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective solution to reduce storage and cost footprint". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Object Storage writes "Can be used to safely store big datasets in the cloud at a reasonable price". Amazon S3 Glacier is most compared with Google Cloud Storage Nearline, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Wasabi and Amazon S3, whereas Microsoft Azure Object Storage is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Wasabi and Amazon S3. See our Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage report.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.