We performed a comparison between Anaplan and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Production Planning solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's simple to use with a lot of functions."
"Where we're seeing the opportunity in the market is at the Fortune 100 companies that have far more complex modeling type scenarios where you need to be able to have a lot of people collaborating together, and you need a lot of information all at everyone's fingertips. This is where you see the big advantage of a solution like Anaplan."
"The best thing is that it's very intuitive and user-friendly. You don't need coding skills to manipulate the platform."
"It's highly flexible. If you've got a complex environment with complex calculations, you can build that out. So that's a really good positive."
"Anaplan's in-memory calculation engine is super-fast compared to the old tools we previously used. You enter the data and everything shows up in one go."
"The most valuable feature of Anaplan is machine learning. The solution is constantly evolving from feedback. Additionally, there is a wide range of training material online."
"Technical support has been good."
"It's real-time connected planning, so the calculations are pretty much seamless as far as your model is connected."
"The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is the flashback it quickly takes you to the data browser. Additionally, one of the newer tools is the orchestrator which is very good."
"It’s a stable product."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are financial reporting, procurement, and project management."
"I have found the solutions best features to be financial procurement, inventory, and manufacturing."
"The product can scale."
"The solution is stable."
"It is easy to inquire about any account in our company."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's most valuable feature is its one consolidated platform that runs all the different aspects of companies."
"Anaplan should come up with flexible options to connect to a data warehouse rather than an Anaplan hub."
"The tool needs to work on its integration with MS Excel and MS Word. The tool does not allow data analysis in spreadsheets which is possible on other platforms. I want the solution to be more collaborative to facilitate decision-making in organizations."
"Anaplan's workflow component is probably the biggest area for improvement. I'd also like to see Anaplan add an ad hoc reporting tool that allows users to query things. It's going to factor into how you design your data set and your models, but I'd like the ability to create ad hoc queries against the data that's in there."
"Anaplan is a relatively expensive piece of software."
"There are workspace issues, like the limitation on model sizes."
"The integration technique should be a little bit easier."
"The cloud engine slows down when working with a large dataset. It still lacks a powerful engine."
"The dashboard could be better. Because within a dashboard or report, you have to do a lot of scrolling. You need to scroll down because the table doesn't fit in a single view. That's why even the users aren't happy with that kind of user experience. They need to scroll to see all the data, and it could be better if it fits in just one page. That way, you can see everything. In the next release, I want automation that's connected to Anaplan. For example, to load master data from SAP to Anaplan. I don't know if this already exists, but a log where you can see the progress and see if there's an error will also help. It would be better to give you the error message, for example, if there is an error within the automated process importing to Anaplan."
"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."
"We found that the system was unable to address many of our concerns, especially when it comes to project management."
"Something that could be included is a supply chain management system. That's what we're looking for."
"Treasury management is typically used in forex, loans, trade management and property management is not available. The solution could improve if they added them."
"They need to improve the logs and need to write some sort of script that clears logs after so many days."
"EnterpriseOne's integration could be improved."
"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."
"The implementation procedure could be simplified."
Anaplan is ranked 6th in Production Planning with 24 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 2nd in Production Planning with 55 reviews. Anaplan is rated 8.0, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Anaplan writes "Great for large-scale modelling, easy to learn, and very stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". Anaplan is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle Hyperion, SAP Analytics Cloud and IBM Planning Analytics, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and PeopleSoft. See our Anaplan vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.
See our list of best Production Planning vendors.
We monitor all Production Planning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.