We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and Informatica Cloud API and App Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The user interface for monitoring and managing workflows has been excellent, particularly in the latest version. c"
"We have been quite satisfied with the stability of the solution."
"The solution's UI allows me to collect all the information and see the code lines."
"Apache Airflow is easy to use and can monitor task execution easily. For instance, when performing setup tasks, you can conveniently view the logs without delving into the job details."
"Every feature in Apache Airflow is valuable. The number of operators and features I've used are mainly related to connectivity services and integrated services because I primarily work with GCP."
"The product integrates well with other pipelines and solutions."
"Since Apache works very well on Python, we can manage everything and create pipelines there."
"The most valuable feature of Apache Airflow is creating and scheduling jobs. Additionally, the reattempt at failed jobs is useful."
"The interface has a great look and feel, and the functionality is so easy."
"The OAuth feature is the most valuable feature for authentication."
"The application integration will give you more flexibility when dealing with APIs."
"The interface is really good."
"The dashboards could be enhanced."
"One specific feature that is missing from Airflow is that the steps of your workflow are not pipelined, meaning the stageless steps of any workflow. Not every workflow can be implemented within Airflow."
"We need to develop our workflow description and notations because out of the box, Apache Airflow does not provide some features that are needed."
"Apache Airflow should have better integration with cloud platforms."
"The problem with Apache Airflow is that it is an open-source tool. You have to build it into a Kubernetes container, which is not easy to maintain, and I find it to be very clunky."
"Enhancements become necessary when scaling it up from a few thousand workflows to a more extensive scale of five thousand or ten thousand workflows."
"It would be beneficial to improve the pricing structure."
"The dashboard is connected into the BPM flow that could be improved."
"There's no direct way to connect to Amazon APIs from Informatica Cloud."
"The setup is complex."
"There could be a lot more application integration."
"The pricing model is problematic."
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Cloud API and App Integration writes " Provides data governance and offer good scalability, with a significant performance boost when moving from on-prem to the cloud". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow, AWS Step Functions and Bizagi, whereas Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is most compared with Pega BPM, Appian, ARIS Cloud, Camunda and Microsoft Azure API Management. See our Apache Airflow vs. Informatica Cloud API and App Integration report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.