Apache Airflow vs webMethods Integration Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Airflow
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (2nd)
webMethods Integration Server
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the market share of Apache Airflow is 6.7% and it decreased by 34.8% compared to the previous year. The market share of webMethods Integration Server is 0.8% and it increased by 19.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
11.5%
 

Featured Reviews

PA
Jul 17, 2023
A tool that needs to improve its complex initial setup and limited integration capabilities but can be useful in workflow automation
The problem with Apache Airflow is that it is an open-source tool. You have to build it into a Kubernetes container, which is not easy to maintain, and I find it to be very clunky. Additionally, there is room for improvement with DAGs. I had a very hard time building DAGs in Apache Airflow. I decided to use Astronomer, which is on top of Apache Airflow and is supposed to make your life easier. The best part of the solution is the third-party add-on which is Astronomer. It would be a very nice tool if it could have been an entirely cloud-based solution. Apache Airflow is not so nice when you have a hybrid setup, such as half is on-premises and half of it is on a cloud environment. It should integrate better with the outside world.
RJ
Oct 21, 2022
Good designer and helpful support, but can be buggy
The solution can be buggy. If I compare it with IBM, before webMethods, we were using IBM DataPower. To be frank, DataPower had very, very minimal bugs. You may have one or two bugs in maybe a year, whereas with Integration Server, with customizations, it comes with all these caveats. We had to go back to support a bit for help. Support is expensive. There is not any capability as a managed service. Maybe a managed service would help people to use it. Or apart from that, I would also say there is a containerized microservices version, yet it is not in a usable format. If you look at a Kubernetes environment, if you want to have a containerized application running in Integration Server, it's still quite very heavy. Maybe webMethods should look at that perspective as well to run a pure proper cloud-native environment. If you look at Spring Boot or maybe a similar open-source application, you can easily containerize and run Kubernetes. In Integration Server, it's not very easy.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The UI is very simple and easy to learn."
"One of its most valuable features is the graphical user interface, providing a visual representation of the pipeline status, successes, failures, and informative developer messages."
"Apache Airflow is easy to use and can monitor task execution easily. For instance, when performing setup tasks, you can conveniently view the logs without delving into the job details."
"The reason we went with Airflow is its DAG presentation, that shows the relationships among everything. It's more of a configuration-driven workflow."
"Every feature in Apache Airflow is valuable. The number of operators and features I've used are mainly related to connectivity services and integrated services because I primarily work with GCP."
"The tool is user-friendly."
"The product is stable."
"Apache Airflow's best feature is its flexibility."
"The most valuable feature of webMethods Integration Server is all the capabilities it provides. We leverage most of the features, that they have offered to us. Our vendor has made some additional features on top of the webMethods Integration Server and we use all the features together."
"High throughput and excellent scalability."
"The tool is very powerful and user-friendly."
"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."
"The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging."
"It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career."
"One valuable feature is that it is event-driven, so when new data is available on the source it can be quickly processed and displayed. Integration is definitely another useful feature, and B2B is one area where webMethods has its own unique thing going, whereby we can do monitoring of transactions, monitoring of client onboarding, and so on."
"The product supports various types of digital documents, including XMLs and EDI."
 

Cons

"The platform's stability needs improvement, particularly regarding occasional interruptions due to networking issues."
"Technical support is an area that needs improvement."
"The documentation must be improved."
"The solution could be improved by simplifying the integration process."
"UI can be improved with additional user-friendly features for non-programmers and for fewer coding practitioner requirements."
"It would be beneficial to improve the pricing structure."
"Airflow should support the dynamic drag creation."
"The graphical user interface can be improved."
"I would like to see the price improve."
"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."
"This product has too many gaps. You find them after update installations. This should be covered by automatic testing."
"The Software AG Designer could be more memory-efficient or CPU-efficient so that we can use it with middle-spec hardware."
"Documentation needs tuning. There is a lot of dependency with SoftwareAG. Even with the documentation at hand, you can struggle to implement scenarios without SAG’s help. By contrast, IBM’s documentation is self-explanatory, in my opinion."
"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."
"The UI for the admin console is very old. It hasn't been updated for years and is pretty much the same one that we started with. This is something that could be refreshed and made more modern."
"In terms of scale, I would give it a four out of 10."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's open source. You can install it locally on your own system. If you are deploying it in the production system, you normally deploy it on some cloud, such as EC2 service, which would have some cost. If you are setting up a Docker container or something for Apache Airflow yourself, which is quite easy, you can do pretty much everything online."
"It is an open-source tool. There are no additional fees or charges associated with the product."
"The pricing for the product is reasonable."
"The solution is free if you use Amazon AWS."
"The pricing is on the higher side."
"Apache Airflow is a free solution that can be downloaded and ready for use at any moment."
"It's open-source."
"For the time being, it doesn't cost anything."
"The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product."
"webMethods Integration Server is expensive, and there's no fixed price on it because it has a point pricing model. You can negotiate, which makes it interesting."
"The solution’s pricing is too high."
"The price of webMethods Integration Server isn't that high from an enterprise context, but open-source ESB solutions will always be the cheapest."
"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."
"It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one."
"With our current licensing, it's very easy for us to scale. With our older licensing model, it was very hard. This is definitely something that I would highlight."
"It is a cost-effective solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
787,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Retailer
5%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?
Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...
What do you like most about Apache Airflow?
Apache Airflow is easy to use and can monitor task execution easily. For instance, when performing setup tasks, you can conveniently view the logs without delving into the job details.
What do you like most about webMethods Integration Server?
The synchronous and asynchronous messaging system the solution provides is very good.
What needs improvement with webMethods Integration Server?
Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area. It's very good as a standalone integration server, but it has to come ...
 

Also Known As

Airflow
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Agari, WePay, Astronomer
Fujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: June 2024.
787,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.