We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and Coralogix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AppDynamics is easy to implement if you follow the documentation, and the documentation that they provide is good."
"I think the performance and interface are the most important features."
"The solution helps us provide a better user experience to our customers."
"It provides everything into one view, so we can track information from one place to another."
"The initial setup is simple."
"The business transaction that stands between multiple applications is proving to be most valuable."
"AppDynamics has a very broad range of supported technologies, and it's user-friendly. It looks nice, and it's easy to sell the solution to the stakeholders when we can visualize how the website is working. For example, where we have any problems through visual analytics."
"The most valuable feature of AppDynamics is Proactive Monitoring and Alerting."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The solution's user interface should be improved."
"The overall performance of this solution could be improved. The hot-hot infrastructure features could also be improved."
"AppDynamics' modules and hardware resources are very high."
"They are using Flash for their website, which is very slow. We had hoped the website would be much faster to use, and that is definitely what we want to see."
"There could be some improvement in the constructions of the diagrams, it is too difficult currently."
"Their support should be improved. Clusters and monitoring can also be improved."
"At this time, we don't have much visibility on the virtual environment, monitoring, and all other things. We have visibility only for database monitoring, and we have noticed performance impact when deploying database agents on the database server. We got to know this from AppDynamics support also that we should not deploy database agents from the database server. When agents are deployed on the same server and the database is monitored from there, we are not getting database server metrics. Therefore, we don't have those insights, and sometimes, we struggle because of that. They can improve this functionality so that we do not have a performance impact, and we can deploy anywhere. This would help us a lot. In terms of end-user monitoring, currently, it is not working for us because there are some complexities. It is a little complicated, and it takes a little bit of time to understand where you need to make changes. It would be very helpful if they can provide some template designs for end-user monitoring. When our servers are running on VMs, we don't get many insights from the VM side. I don't know whether it is possible to have visibility beyond the database, server, and application and whether there are some features where we can deploy AppDynamics on VMs as well. Such functionality would give us more control over storage, VM, OS, and database. It will also provide complete visibility of our hardware and software."
"There are too many installers available for this solution."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
AppDynamics is ranked 5th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 155 reviews while Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while Coralogix is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Very good real-time monitoring capabilities, deep problem diagnosis, and transaction mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, New Relic and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager. See our AppDynamics vs. Coralogix report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
