We performed a comparison between Coralogix and Datadog based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"Its logs are most valuable."
"The CCM, Workflows, Logs, APM, and RUM are all useful aspects of the solution."
"The ingestion points are unlimited and support customization. We haven't had anything yet that we haven't been able to integrate with it."
"The solution's SaaS model is easy to manage and works well in single- or multi-cloud environments."
"Anything I've wanted to do, I found a way to get it done through Datadog."
"If we have a large load for users using our basic Datadog, it will immediately fire off an alert notifying us either something's wrong or not."
"The dashboards and the performance of the software have been great."
"Having a wealth of information has helped us investigate outages, and having historical data helps us tune our system."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"If there were a more cost-effective manner of deploying the tool, we'd be more likely to adopt it more widely."
"Deploying the agents is still very manual."
"We would really like to see more from the Service Catalog."
"We want to reduce having to go to different screens to obtain all the information."
"It would be great if usage metrics were automatically created and we could create custom metrics, instead we ended up building some of our own stuff to track and alert on our own usage."
"We primarily use the log management functionality, and the only feedback I have there is better fuzzy text searching in logs (the kind that Kibana has)."
"Since the Datadog platform has so many separate features, solving so many use cases, there are often inconsistencies in feature availability and interoperability between products."
"The pricing model could be simplified as it feels a bit outdated, especially when you look at the billing model of compute instances vs the containers instances."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while Datadog is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". Coralogix is most compared with Grafana, Sentry, New Relic, Elastic Search and Logz.io, whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and OpsRamp. See our Coralogix vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.