We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and OpenText Business Process Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have found the main feature of the solution to be its ability to analyze an application's code to see where there are issues. Additionally, it is easy to use and configure."
"This solution is easy to use and very powerful, it is a complete tool for us."
"AppDynamics' most valuable features are the response time of the business transaction modules, the ability to monitor multiple services, and testing and developing environments."
"It has improved my organization because we are able to proactively and reactively look at performance issues."
"We set up alerts recently so we can fix any issues more quickly in production."
"I think the performance and interface are the most important features."
"In 2014 and 2015, AppDynamics was one of the best products on the market."
"It is a good monitoring tool. Its stability is very good."
"The stability has been very good over the years."
"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."
"AppDynamics could benefit from greater integration with emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning."
"The QA and test environment need improvement."
"We constantly need to improve our alert mechanism because we get a lot of false-positive alerts. These are not real errors. In addition, for end-user monitoring, sometimes, we are not able to catch all user activities. Because of not being able to follow the user activity from the start to the end, we are missing out on the performance issues."
"There could log management features included in the product."
"Their support should be improved. Clusters and monitoring can also be improved."
"They need to improve the consolidation of agents for the agent's installation process."
"If it can be able to intelligently provide all the things we need to look at, from a data point of view, that would be very useful."
"The UI could use a little help."
"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."
"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."
AppDynamics is ranked 5th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 154 reviews while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is ranked 58th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Very good real-time monitoring capabilities, deep problem diagnosis, and transaction mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Process Monitoring writes "Stable with good performance visibility but is a discontinued product". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas OpenText Business Process Monitoring is most compared with Dynatrace. See our AppDynamics vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.