We performed a comparison between Appian and ProcessMaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I find the BPM the most valuable feature."
"The technical support is excellent."
"It has good integrations. We were looking for out-of-the-box integration with both on-prem and publicly accessible data sources. We needed integration with the cloud, OData, our REST API feed, and then on-prem passthrough to go to a SQL database or on-prem APIs through Azure local deployment, etc."
"Process Modeling enables creation of business process workflows. You can create complex business workflows in a visual manner, and it is also easy to debug/monitor."
"The process models provide self-documenting systems."
"Technical support has been amazing overall."
"It is really simple to create a new app, and I like the data-centric aspect of the BPM tool."
"The setup is easy."
"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."
"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."
"We'd like improved functionality for testing new devices."
"It would be useful if they could create an academy or forum in the future to help active users answer questions they have about the solution."
"If that had more DevOps capabilities, it would be an excellent product."
"The reporting is not as good as in similar products. They could also improve the dashboards."
"One room for improvement is the ease of UI UX development, like in OutSystems and Mendix."
"The biggest areas of improvement would be in facilitating team development, DevOps, and integration with typical tools used in enterprise development (Jenkins, Subversion, etc.)"
"We would like to see more reduced latency. We would like to make sure that the scale-out factor will be much more as workloads come in."
"The graphical user interface could be easier to use. It should be simplified."
"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."
Earn 20 points
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 58 reviews while ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM). Appian is rated 8.4, while ProcessMaker is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Camunda, ServiceNow, OutSystems and Pega BPM, whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Camunda, Apache Airflow, Bonita and Bizagi. See our Appian vs. ProcessMaker report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.