We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and ProcessMaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Apache Airflow is in Python language, making it easy to use and learn."
"It's stable."
"I like the UI rework, it's much easier."
"The UI is very simple and easy to learn."
"Designing processes and workflows is easier, and it assists in coordinating all of the different processes."
"The reason we went with Airflow is its DAG presentation, that shows the relationships among everything. It's more of a configuration-driven workflow."
"This is a simple tool to automate using Python."
"We're running it on a virtual server, which we can easily upgrade if needed."
"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."
"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."
"We need to develop our workflow description and notations because out of the box, Apache Airflow does not provide some features that are needed."
"I have some issues with the solution's communication."
"Airflow should support the dynamic drag creation."
"Technical support is an area that needs improvement."
"The graphical user interface can be improved."
"One specific feature that is missing from Airflow is that the steps of your workflow are not pipelined, meaning the stageless steps of any workflow. Not every workflow can be implemented within Airflow."
"The problem with Apache Airflow is that it is an open-source tool. You have to build it into a Kubernetes container, which is not easy to maintain, and I find it to be very clunky."
"I would like to see some no-code capabilities and drag and drop abilities in Airflow."
"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."
Earn 20 points
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM). Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while ProcessMaker is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Camunda, Bonita, Appian and Bizagi. See our Apache Airflow vs. ProcessMaker report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.