We performed a comparison between Aruba ClearPass and macmon Network Access Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Aruba ClearPass is a simple solution for customers to see what is happening on their network."
"Gives us network access control, visibility, scalability, security, and control in what is becoming an uncontrollable, inundated BYOD and IoT world."
"The visibility and security features are most valuable. We get a clear view. It is a very secure product for educational institutions."
"ClearPass is effortless to use and configure. It's not hard to learn the tool, and it has lots of features."
"If you are looking at the base installation, then it was a very straightforward process, which I would rate an eight or nine out of ten."
"It makes it easy to require robust user authentication for both wired and wireless endpoints, including BYODs."
"The most valuable features of Aruba ClearPass are the GUI and its ease-to-do configuration. Additionally, we can troubleshoot many things in one window."
"ClearPass's best feature is its comprehensiveness."
"We use it with our Cisco switches so we can see which switch it is actually connected to."
"The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me."
"The API is a great way to get information from other tools."
"I would like to see is “AAS”. Not only Aruba APs with central, but NAC/ClearPass, AirWave, and everything licensed as a Service. This way, like AWS, they can spin up what they need when they need it and vice versa."
"One area for improvement would be the possibility of using social media providers for user authentication."
"The improvement can be in the cloud area. They can improve it for the cloud so that we can deploy it on the cloud."
"The solution needs to upgrade its user interface. Right now, it's not so user friendly, and it's an aspect that my clients' wish was improved upon."
"Instructions on adding layouts are not as clear as they could be."
"Lacks the ability to handle more than one certificate for both the management process and the Captive Portal."
"If you look at the tool's deployment phase from a fine-tuning perspective, I feel it was very complex."
"The initial setup phase of the solution was really very difficult, owing to which the setup phase can be considered as an area that can be improved."
"The solution must allow users to filter files based on dates."
"The service macmon offers is already great."
"The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly."
More macmon Network Access Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba ClearPass is ranked 2nd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 75 reviews while macmon Network Access Control is ranked 9th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Aruba ClearPass is rated 8.6, while macmon Network Access Control is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aruba ClearPass writes "Easy to use, multifeatured, and reliable policy management platform for identity authentication and new device onboarding". On the other hand, the top reviewer of macmon Network Access Control writes "A robust solution that provides protection to effectively control the access to your network". Aruba ClearPass is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, Microsoft Intune and ExtremeControl, whereas macmon Network Access Control is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC and Forescout Platform. See our Aruba ClearPass vs. macmon Network Access Control report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.