We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiNAC and macmon Network Access Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiNAC is its integration with all other Fortinet solutions."
"I like FortiNAC's integration with other Fortinet devices. They work together well, but the solution also works with other network devices."
"The support responds to our queries within two to four hours."
"Provides good performance, is easy to use and configure."
"It's a very good solution and one thing I have noted is its simplicity and the ease of the set-up process."
"The interface is good and simple to use."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiNAC are access control, automation, artificial intelligence, analysis, and security, and it is a unified solution. You can combine a lot of features within the solution."
"The initial setup was easy and straightforward."
"The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me."
"We use it with our Cisco switches so we can see which switch it is actually connected to."
"The API is a great way to get information from other tools."
"I would like to be able to compare the configuration backup before and after."
"Fortinet FortiNAC's documentation should be improved because there's not much debugging or troubleshooting documentation for the Fortinet FortiNAC."
"This solution could be more agile."
"The user interface and the product's intuitiveness could be improved."
"FortiNAC could be more scalable."
"The platform must enable troubleshooting."
"The reporting can also use improvement."
"The automation in Fortinet FortiNAC could improve."
"The service macmon offers is already great."
"The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly."
"The solution must allow users to filter files based on dates."
More macmon Network Access Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 3rd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 44 reviews while macmon Network Access Control is ranked 9th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 7.6, while macmon Network Access Control is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor". On the other hand, the top reviewer of macmon Network Access Control writes "A robust solution that provides protection to effectively control the access to your network". Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Ruckus Cloudpath, whereas macmon Network Access Control is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Forescout Platform. See our Fortinet FortiNAC vs. macmon Network Access Control report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.