We performed a comparison between Aruba Remote Access Points and Fortinet FortiClient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"It’s very light."
"The platform has the most valuable advanced filtering feature."
"The product is very flexible. So far the stability of the solution has been good."
"This solution is widely adopted and involves both technology and non-technical devices. It is robust, except in cases of significant power outages."
"It provides good Spectrum Analysis and troubleshooting."
"The authentication features are valuable."
"What I like best about Aruba Remote Access Points is that it's pretty easy to set up."
"It is a very stable tool."
"It’s easy to use."
"It is very powerful."
"It works well and the performance is good."
"Secure and easy connect is the most valuable feature. It is a reliable solution, and it works."
"We like its centralized administration, integration with Active Directory, deployment, and stability of the connection."
"FortiClient has good signatures, good protection and, up until recently, it integrated really well with our firewall."
"The initial setup of this solution is easy."
"It is a feature-rich product that is easy to use and install without sacrificing security."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The remote access point coverage should be bigger than it is now."
"It would help if the remote APs had some kind of SoHo environment with built-in firewall features. That way it could connect directly in a client-to-site type of environment, or a site-to-site VPN environment. That way users could have a complete office setup without coming to the private cloud."
"The security side of Aruba Remote Access Points could be improved."
"Its scalability capabilities should be improved."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing. If they can be more competitive."
"The product needs an increased level of security for the end user."
"The solution's technical support has some shortcomings that need improvement."
"There are some issues, like the VLAN capabilities and support for routing between two VMs."
"The current version of this solution does not show the malicious websites that have been visited. They should add this to an upcoming release."
"There isn't much to improve in terms of features and comparison with other vendors. It just needs to stay more up to date in catching the malware. The user interface may be improved, which would be a minor enhancement. Unlike central management, in endpoint security, the end users don't need to keep looking at the endpoint user interface. The technology is the most important thing in endpoint security."
"We've had some problems with having to remove the current version and either reinstalling an old version or updating to the new one."
"The deployment status is not good in Mac devices and sometimes in Windows-based devices using GPO, like Active Directory, that are not on the local network."
"When we change our endpoint, we have to connect again, which means having to enter our credentials and permissions."
"It would be nice to see more in hand features in terms of the DLP, so that the solution can be integrated with the DLP, as well as more reporting features on the end point."
"It would be extremely useful to have an automatic updating feature."
"I haven't found that that solution does anything amazing."
Aruba Remote Access Points is ranked 13th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 13 reviews while Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 86 reviews. Aruba Remote Access Points is rated 7.8, while Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aruba Remote Access Points writes "The solution can be used from home or any remote office to access office resources like printers and servers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". Aruba Remote Access Points is most compared with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, OpenVPN Access Server, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Zyxel VPN Client, whereas Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiEDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway. See our Aruba Remote Access Points vs. Fortinet FortiClient report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
