We performed a comparison between Aruba Virtual Intranet Access and Check Point Remote Access VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution is very user friendly."
"Thanks to all these security processes, our users can access our infrastructure with the certainty that we will not be compromised."
"I found the MEP feature the most valuable. This has improved users' latency allowing the users to connect to the nearest Azure Check Point VM."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN is a stable solution."
"Our users find the interface very comfortable to use."
"Check Point has been perfect for protecting us from any type of attack or data theft during remote management."
"The policies are easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the seamless access."
"The solution is easy to install, centrally managed, and stable, with good technical support and a straightforward setup."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Configurations can be a bit complex."
"This is the best version we are using, however, if some changes can be made in the next release, I'd like to see adjustments to the time period and internet connectivity."
"The VPN remote Access blade could be improved."
"They could add more features, like the security to block off the doors, or create another hatch, something like this. They could make the features safer, add malware to make my mail and the Kryon system safer and to protect data at an earlier stage."
"Compliance Check on Check Point should be improved by having more configurable conditions to support multi-platforms and adding more granularity."
"They need to increase their timeout. Right now, it will fail after ten seconds, however, it shouldn't fail until after 20 seconds."
"The Compliance software blade is available only for the Windows operating systems family, so no macOS security checks are implemented and performed."
"A characteristic to improve is the communication service under the SMTP scheme."
"The cost of maintenance is high compared to most products in the market."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 31st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 61 reviews. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 7.0, while Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Aruba Virtual Intranet Access writes "Very user friendly but configurations can be a bit complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, whereas Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.