Based on our user's reviews, we compared Okta Workforce Identity and Auth0 across several parameters.
Based on the user reviews and considering the overall sentiment, Okta Workforce Identity is preferred over Auth0. Users highly value Okta's seamless integration with various applications and systems, robust security measures, and user-friendly interface. They also appreciate Okta's exceptional customer service and support. While Auth0 also receives positive feedback for its ROI, seamless integration, and user-friendly interface, Okta's customer service and support and its ability to streamline access management processes give it an edge over Auth0.
"It is easily connected and easy to put our app in single sign-on."
"The most valuable feature is that it is simple to integrate, irrespective of your codebase."
"The most valuable feature of the product is scalability."
"It has a lot of customization and out-of-the-box features."
"The valuable features are that it is extremely secure and that it's developer-friendly."
"It is very scalable because it provides a new environment for companies based on their number of users and other factors. The tool can take a lot of users."
"I simply use the JWT from the client on the server side to process requests and push updated profile data to a database/queue as needed and end the process without having to persist data in the web server (sessions)."
"It supports identity federation, FSO and multi-tenancy."
"First of all, the solution is very simple."
"We face no challenges in integrating the product with our legacy systems."
"Having a single sign-on to all our applications."
"The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are SSO, MFA, and beneficial feature sets."
"The provisioning functionality has been the most valuable. This solution has good performance, fast integration and is very responsive."
"The solution so far has been very stable."
"The initial setup is easy."
"What I found most valuable in Okta Workforce Identity is that it worked together with VMware Workspace One, so there was this device check at the same time. My company used the trusted device method that enabled you to define that only the trusted devices including the Workspace One agent were able to access the applications directly without an additional authentication step."
"There is a possibility to improve the machine-to-machine authentication flow. This part of Auth0 is not really well documented, and we could really gain some additional knowledge on that."
"There are indeed areas where the product could improve. For instance, Okta offers various application configurations, enabling access management, which the tool could consider implementing."
"The product support for multi-tenancy could be improved."
"The Management API could be improved so it's easier to get user information."
"The product could use a more flexible administration structure"
"I think they can do a better job in explaining what you're supposed to do next in order to correctly follow an idiomatic approach to using the solution beyond simply passing a JWT token to a server and having the server check then signature to validate the token."
"In the past, there was an issue with the multi-tenant where there wasn't the ability to manage them."
"The tool's price should be improved."
"The only area of concern in the solution stems from the fact that my company needs some help regarding the setup phase from a partner."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve provisioning it can be made simpler."
"Okta Workforce Identity can improve by having more features in governance."
"It is challenging to obtain a comprehensive backup."
"It would be pricing, which is a tough one because it goes against Microsoft. A lot of companies say they're a Microsoft partner, and they get all their software for free. Okta is like a luxury product, and it's not the most affordable one. I would say if they could work on pricing, it would help. Other than that, they've done great strides in developing a product that is really good. The companies that do see the value tend to invest in it."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the way passwords are reset and how it interfaces with Microsoft."
"The only aspect in which it can be improved is that the interface could be cleaner. I found this even when I was trying to do my certification exam because the certification is hands-on. You find yourself fumbling around a little bit to find simple things. This happens even when you start to get familiar with the product."
"Its pricing needs improvement."
Auth0 is ranked 3rd in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 14 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 56 reviews. Auth0 is rated 8.2, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Auth0 writes "Has good documentation but improvement is needed in MFA and application configurations ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". Auth0 is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Amazon Cognito, Frontegg, Cloudflare Access and Microsoft Entra Verified ID, whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and IBM Security Verify Access. See our Auth0 vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.