We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Our entire use case was very easily handled or solved using this solution."
"It is AWS-integrated. There is end-to-end integration with the other AWS services. It is also user-friendly."
"What I like best about AWS Glue is its real-time data backup feature. Last week, there was a production push, and what used to take almost ten days to send out around fifty-six thousand emails now takes only two hours."
"The solution helps organizations gain flexibility in defining the structure of the data."
"It's fairly straightforward as a product; it's not very complicated."
"The most valuable feature for me is the visual interface of AWS Glue."
"AWS Glue is a stable and easy-to-use solution."
"Data catalog and triggers are the two best features for me. AWS Glue has its own data catalog, which makes it great and really easy to use. Triggers are also really good for scheduling the ETL process."
"This is the easiest and best tool available."
"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."
"The flexibility has been great overall."
"It's easy to develop APIs."
"The community manager is the standout feature of the Mule Anypoint Platform, as it provides a platform to showcase your API to external parties. It is exceptionally user-friendly and enables external parties to easily utilize and consume the APIs."
"The solution's deployment and proxy processes are very good."
"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."
"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."
"The technical support for this solution could be improved. In future, we would like to connect more services like Athena or Kinesis to help control more loads of data."
"The product is expensive for data streaming. This area needs improvement."
"It fails to handle massive databases acquired from various sources."
"The solution should offer features for streaming data in addition to batching data."
"One area that could be improved is the ETL view. The drag-and-drop interface is not as user-friendly as some other ETL tools."
"The setup and installation is a bit complex without advanced knowledge or training."
"Glue could perform better. It sometimes takes too long to test a Glue job. Google Cloud Platform offers more Python scripts than AWS."
"The crucial problem with AWS Glue is that it only works with AWS. It is not an agnostic tool like Pentaho. In PowerCenter, we can install the forms from Google and other vendors, but in the case of AWS Glue, we can only use AWS."
"Mule should have better B2B integration."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 41 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Talend Open Studio, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform. See our AWS Glue vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.