We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and SAP Cloud Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."
"Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment."
"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"The tool is very capable and offers a high performance. The tool supports batch processing and ETL processing."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."
"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"Though I'm not a massive fan of the SAP Cloud Platform, it has good features, such as its integration with other SAP solutions. When integrating with SAP or even the SAP sister company SuccessFactors and other companies SAP has acquired, you also enjoy data features in the SAP Cloud Platform, such as role-based permissions and other characteristics you can import from SAP."
"The solution can scale."
"The dashboard provides pretty good clarity."
"One of the most valuable features I have found is that the solution is secure."
"One of the best features of this solution is that it is web-based and you can log in and work on it from anywhere."
"I found flexibility most valuable in the SAP Cloud Platform. It's a simple tool that's good even for first-time users."
"Improved our speed to bring our mobile applications into productive use in a cost-effective way."
"It’s great that we have the entire suite of SAP at our fingertips."
"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."
"Lacks intelligent management data and intelligent mappings."
"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."
"My impression of the stability is that it is not good. Almost every month there is something new and that makes us nervous about delivery."
"I feel that SAP provides the tools, but after that, you are left on your own. It would be better if they provided more support throughout the usage of their solutions."
"The product needs improvement for serverless native integrations. They should opt for serverless features as all the customers worldwide choose cloud-based products."
"When they innovate too fast, they end up confusing their customers."
"In person, when the development happens, we were told that it's flexible and customizable. However, sometimes, it's challenging to customize."
"I would like for it to have integration to GitHub."
"Planning features are limited to the finance module."
"The tool's UI is not very intuitive for cloud integration, so it needs research to understand its options and how it may work."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 40 reviews while SAP Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 38 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while SAP Cloud Platform is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Cloud Platform writes "Provides seamless integration with CTI for streamlined data synchronization but complexity and challenges in migrating existing applications to the low-code model for custom application development". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and Azure Data Factory, whereas SAP Cloud Platform is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, webMethods.io Integration and Mendix. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Cloud Platform report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.