We performed a comparison between GuardDuty and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: AWS GuardDuty is highly regarded for its extensive monitoring capabilities, threat detection, and ability to analyze various log sources. Trend Micro Cloud One is highly praised for its vulnerability scanning and ability to provide visibility into critical events. Users have suggested that AWS GuardDuty could improve by adding a mobile version and more dashboard analytics. Reviewers feel that Trend Micro Cloud One should enhance automation, simplify deployment, and offer more competitive pricing.
Service and Support: AWS GuardDuty customers are satisfied with the swift and helpful support they've received from the Amazon team. Cloud One users commended Trend Micro's support team for their extensive knowledge and expertise.
Ease of Deployment: AWS GuardDuty users described the initial as simple and quick. Some Trend Micro Cloud One users said the setup was easy, but others noted that it may pose a challenge for less experienced users.
Pricing: AWS GuardDuty offers a pay-go license, with different pricing tiers based on usage levels. There are no extra costs apart from the standard licensing. Reviewers say Trend Micro Cloud One isn't expensive per se, but the license could be more competitive. Trend Micro offers monthly, quarterly, or annual payment options. Additional services can be purchased at an added cost.
ROI: AWS GuardDuty improves security and builds customer confidence, helping businesses expand. Trend Micro Cloud One provides a versatile return on investment by offering effortless integration and cancellation options, and users have not reported any negative encounters.
Comparison Results: User reviews indicate that AWS GuardDuty is preferred over Trend Micro Cloud One. Reviewers liked GuardDuty's comprehensive monitoring capabilities and advanced threat response. Users find the setup process for GuardDuty to be simple and straightforward, whereas some users reported difficulties with Cloud One. GuardDuty also earned high marks for its reasonable pricing, but users say Trend Micro could lower the price of Cloud One to match competitors.
"It's helped free up staff time so that they can work on other projects."
"It's positively affected the communication between cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams."
"All the features we use are equal and get the job done."
"The user interface is well-designed and easy to navigate."
"We liked the search bar in PingSafe. It is a global search. We were able to get some insights from there."
"The solution is a good alerting tool."
"The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best features."
"PingSafe can integrate all your cloud accounts and resources you create in the AWS account, We have set it up to scan the AWS transfer services, EC2, security groups, and GitHub."
"It kinda just gives us another layer of security. So it does provide some sort of comfort that we do have something that is monitoring for abnormal behavior."
"With anomaly detection, active threat monitoring, and set correlation, GuardDuty alerts me to any unusual user behavior or traffic patterns right away, which is great for staying on top of potential security risks."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The product has automated protection powered by AI/ML, which is now far more powerful than before. It uses AI/ML in its detection algorithm, providing fast and quick results."
"The correlation back end is the solution's most valuable feature."
"AWS GuardDuty helps by providing continuous threat detection and signaling potential threats. Its most valuable feature is continuous monitoring. The tool's integration with other AWS services has improved security. It provides continuous monitoring and intelligent threat detection, quickly signaling any issues. I would rate this improvement a seven out of ten."
"We have over 1,000 employees, and we monitor their activity through AWS GuardDuty."
"It is a highly scalable solution since it is a service by AWS. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"I like the conformity and workload security modules. Workload security is all about intrusion detection and prevention. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has behavioral rules that are auto-populated based on organizational structure. That's one aspect that we liked most."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"The most valuable features are intrusion prevention and anti-malware capabilities."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"The stability is quite good."
"PingSafe's current documentation could be improved to better assist customers during the cluster onboarding process."
"Cloud Native Security's reporting could be better. We are unable to see which images are impacted. Several thousand images have been deployed, so if we can see some application-specific information in the dashboard, we can directly send that report to the team that owns the application. We'd also like the option to download the report from the portal instead of waiting for the report to be sent to our email."
"We are getting reports only in a predefined form. I would like to have customized reports so that I can see how many issues are open or closed today or in two weeks."
"We've found a lot of false positives."
"We are experiencing problems with Cloud Native Security reporting."
"When you find a vulnerability and resolve it, the same issue will not occur again. I want PingSafe to block the same vulnerability from appearing again. I want something like a playbook where the steps that we take to resolve an issue are repeated when that issue happens again."
"The recommended actions aren't always specific, so it might suggest recommendations that don't apply to the particular infrastructure code I'm reviewing."
"They need more experienced support personnel."
"It would be great if the solution had some automation capabilities."
"We currently find Lacework to be much better at detecting vulnerabilities than AWS GuardDuty. The engines of AWS GuardDuty have to be improved."
"There is currently no consolidated dashboard for AWS GuardDuty. It would be helpful if they could provide a dashboard based on severity levels (high, medium, low) and offer insights account-wise, especially for users utilizing automation structures."
"The solution has to be integrated with new services that AWS adds like QuickSight, Managed Airflow, AppFlow and MWAA."
"Some of the pain points in Amazon GuardDuty was the cost. When compared to some of the other services, depending on how many we had to monitor, if we had a huge range of accounts, as our accounts increased, we had a cost factor that came into play. Sometimes there were issues, for example, with findings that came up, we wanted to add notes and there were issues back then where notes couldn't be entered properly. If we wanted to leave a note such as "Okay, we have assessed this and this is how we feel", or "This is a false positive", Amazon GuardDuty wasn't allowing us to do that. Even with the suppression of certain findings, there was some issue that we had faced at one time. Those were some of the pain points of the solution."
"One improvement I would suggest for AWS GuardDuty is the ability to assign findings to specific users or groups, facilitating better communication and follow-up actions."
"The product needs to improve its cost-efficiency since it is expensive."
"Because it's a threat detection service, they need to keep up with the various threat factors because new threat factors and attack factors come up all the time."
"The pricing can get high."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
"The licensing model could be improved. To gain full coverage, you need to spend more to buy subscriptions for each kind of service they offer. It will start to be pricey if you want full coverage."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security could improve connections with different types of authentication and user groups concerning cloud services."
"Documentation on cloud architecture and job architecture would be helpful."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS GuardDuty is ranked 4th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 20 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 7th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 17 reviews. AWS GuardDuty is rated 8.2, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AWS GuardDuty writes "A stellar threat-detection service that has helped bolster security against malicious threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". AWS GuardDuty is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Wiz and Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS Security Hub and Orca Security. See our AWS GuardDuty vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
